BuzzH
Well-known member
I can't speak to what another chapter would do in their state.Question was for you as Co-Chair for BHA as a whole. Figured there were certain standards involved in the support or opposition on issues that hit below the belt for Backcountry hunter interest.
I understand it's good for the Residents. No worries. I understand certain aspects are targeted because the likely-hood of changing the tide in favor of conservation, hunters, and anglers holds a reasonable % - thus worth the $ and time. I'm a bit disappointed the Resident interest to keep our public land to themselves and their friends within WY BHA for something I would hope MT BHA would oppose.
Win some lose some. Until the next time to grind this axe.
Since the wilderness guide law passed in Wyoming a couple/few decades before BHA even existed, it's a whole different deal to change.
Stopping a piece of bad legislation from becoming law is a way different deal than repealing an existing law.
IMO/E I don't think most NR hunters would be too keen to give up what it would take to repeal.
It could probably be done for a loss of 75% of the available NR tags. Residents would want 90% of DEA tags, outfitters would want 5%. That kind of deal could get enough traction to repeal the law.
Anything less is a waste of time even trying.
I agree it's a shitty law, but it's entrenched. It would take a high price to reverse it.