Use Promo Code Randy for 20% off OutdoorClass

Good Montana Big Horn Article

BigHornRam

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Messages
14,144
Location
"Land of Giant Rams"
The battle of the bighorns
By MICHAEL BABCOCK
Tribune Outdoor Editor


Wildlife officials struggle to balance populations, habitat and hunter demand
Wildlife managers in Montana this winter trapped and transplanted more than
200 bighorn sheep to try and keep the highly prized big game animals within
population objectives.
But sending Montana sheep - many of them pregnant ewes - to states like North
Dakota, Nebraska, Wyoming and Utah puts the fur up on hunters and some sheep
fanciers alike.


ADVERTISEMENT

"That's about 400 bighorns that won't be in Montana this fall," said Kalispell
hunter Danny Moore.

Moore has unsuccessfully applied for a bighorn tag for 43 years and he says
hunters should be given an opportunity to harvest excess sheep.
But managing bighorn sheep is a delicate balancing act, according to both top
wildlife managers at Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks and the executive director
of the Foundation for North American Wild Sheep.

Too many sheep in too little habitat stresses the animals. They fall prey to
diseases such as pneumonia, which can spread quickly through a herd and result
in a massive die-off.

Such die-offs occurred in many hunting districts throughout the state in the
mid-1990s and more recently in the sheep herd in the Highland Mountains south
of Butte.

"Everybody is concerned, whether they are a trophy hunter or a meat hunter,"
said Jim Weatherly, executive director of FNAWS. "There are sheep out there
and it is a very coveted tag. People out there are waiting. There is even a
bill in the Legislature to make this a once-in-a-lifetime tag."

Quentin Kujala, head of wildlife management for Fish, Wildlife & Parks, says
bighorn populations around the state generally are above management
objectives. He calls the populations "robust" in any area where trap and
transplant operations occurred this winter.

Earlier this year, Graham Taylor, head of wildlife for Region 4 in Great
Falls, said the sheep population on the Rocky Mountain Front west of Augusta
is about 1,000 while the FWP target population is 800.

A survey last August in the Missouri Breaks found bighorn sheep numbers at or
above the target population with many of the sheep being mature rams.

Gus Wolfe, the land access manager for the Dick and Nancy Klick Ranch on the
Rocky Mountain Front near the Sun River Canyon, keeps close tabs on the
Fairview Plateau/Ford Creek sheep herd. He says he mingles with a bout 200
bighorns almost daily.

"Based on a little more experience than the average biologist, I don't see how
they can (trap and transplant) every year," Wolfe said. "The last few years,
with the (hunting) quotas they have, they pretty well have taken every big
ram. I think we have to set back and say 'Whoa.'

"They hang this disease thing over you," he said. "If we did have that, the
numbers would be way down."

Wolfe says population counts from FWP often reflect wintering herds, when
sheep are concentrated.

"You got a little bit of butter and you are trying to spread it over the whole
piece of toast," Wolfe said.

Kujala said the question is, what do you base your number evaluation on - too
many or two few?

"When we look back in time, we ask what is the consistency of our operations,"
he said. "In case of the Sun River, Castle Reef, the area back of Gibson
Reservoir and the Ford Creek country, you come to the notion that 200 observed
sheep per hunting district is about right.

"Right now, there are in excess of 300 sheep in the Castle Reef area and in
HD424, we are approaching 400 observed sheep. If you give any credence to
disease issue you are all but driven to say best information is this."

Shoot more sheep

Moore, the Kalispell hunter, said, "If we have too many sheep, please give
more tags and hunting opportunities to Montana hunters before you ship them
away to another state."

Weatherly said issuing more tags would work in districts with smaller herds
and tougher country. But in areas such as the Sun River and Thompson Falls
areas, where sheep numbers are exploding, issuing ewe tags is questionable.

"Should you issue 100 ewe tags? If I was a hunter and it took 30 years to draw
a tag, would I want to go out there with all these hunters shooting ewes? It
would really detract from the hunt. And, how many would take ewe tags?" he
said.

Weatherly points out that several years ago the Salish and Kootenai
Confederated Tribes tried to thin the bighorn population in a portion of HD
124 that it shares with the state. The tribes issued 100 ewe tags but only 18
hunters took ewes.

Great Falls hunter Bruce Auchly, who happens also to be an information officer
for Fish, Wildlife & Parks, hunted ewes two years ago on Castle Reef west of
Augusta.

"I am not a sheep hunter but I do want to hunt sheep and ewe tags are pretty
easy to get. The odds are very good. I wanted to try eating some and I did and
I loved it.

"It is rich, almost to the point of being sweet," Auchly said. "It does not
taste like mutton. I have had friends who have shot bighorn males and they
couldn't give the stuff away."

Auchly said he gave some to friends whose teen-age daughter didn't like game
meat and she asked for seconds.

"I don't know that hunting (ewes) is the answer," Weatherly said. In the case
of HD 124, that hunting pressure would drive the sheep over on to the Flathead
Indian Reservation.

"There is a whole range of solutions that have to be specific to the herds you
are trying to manage," Weatherly said. "Field biologists when they talk to
people who went out and harvested ewes, were told it is a great piece of meat
but would they do it again and the answer is no."

Ron Jenkins of Augusta, a taxidermist and bighorn fancier, grew up in the
Augusta area; his family had a cabin in HD 424. He estimates he has been on
more than 100 sheep hunts throughout North America and he loves sheep hunting
so much, he guides friends who have sheep tags.

"I am a sheep nut, which you easily can become if you like the mountains and
like to hunt," Jenkins said. "There is always somebody who draws a tag and I
go along so I get to hunt."

Jenkins says he has no problem with FWP's sheep management but he doesn't like
the idea of shooting ewes. Jenkins said the idea of offering more ewe tags is
not practical because "hunters don't have that much interest in ewes."

Kujala said in some sheep districts there are groups of hunters that would
like to hunt ewes. But in others, such as some of the Sun River hunting
districts, that interest is weak or never developed at all.

He said for some, price is an issue. They don't want to spend $125 to hunt a
ewe, although they will spend that to hunt a ram. And, if hunters do decide to
shoot a ewe, they are likely to hunt where the hunting is easiest and there
are congregations of sheep.

"In HD 424 (in the Ford Creek area west of Augusta) there is a significant
number hunters who go to the Ford Creek steps (a relatively easy area to
hunt). That means there is a disproportionate harvest carried by some subgroup
of the overall population."

That might change the migration patterns of a bighorn herd. But trapping and
transplanting offers game managers and opportunity to strategically manage
specific herds.

"Everybody wants big old rams and there are only a limited number of those in
any given herd. I think FWP is fairly proactive," Weatherly said. "In areas
where suddenly they have gotten a bunch of extra rams, they have increased the
tags just because the rams are there."

Transplanting sheep

Transplants are done in early winter - after the hunting season and before
lambs get heavy with pregnancy.

"That is out of concern for handlers and the critters," said Kujala.

Kujala said all of the trapping this year was accomplished through net gunning
rather than bait and trap. Helicopters fly low over sheep and shoot a net over
them.

He said any males that were transplanted were either lambs or rams younger
than 2 1/2 years. Older rams are difficult to deal with: they are aggressive
in the trailer and beat up the ewes and they tend to run off when they are
released.

Kujala said the cost of such an operation costs about $650 per sheep, which is
paid for by the state that receives the sheep.

Montana also benefits from the lab work that must be done on each trapped
sheep and the states receiving the sheep pay for that.

"We have other states who dearly want and have habitat for more sheep right
now and what better way to insure we have a resource for sheep in the future
if we have a die-offs," Weatherly said. "It ensures that we have sheep for
us."

Weatherly says there are avid sheep hunters and fanciers in states that don't
have sheep: There are chapters of FNAWS in Iowa, Minnesota and Wisconsin.

"They gave us money last year to buy habitat over by Anaconda," he said. "In
this case, they paid for the transplant into North Dakota."

Troubled areas

Kujala says there are two bighorn sheep hunting districts in the state where
bighorn populations are so troubled that hunting seasons were ended there.
They are the Highlands south of Butte and the Tendoy Mountain in the Wise
River Country.

The Highlands had a generally healthy and robust sheep herd until a die-off
there in the late 1990s or early 2000s. After a die-off in the Tendoys, sheep
numbers are rebounding but at something less than gangbuster levels.

Kujala said he often is asked why not put the 200 sheep that Montana
transplanted out to other states this year into the Highlands and the Tendoys.

"You have to ask yourself if the area is ready," he said. "Is whatever
initiated the die-off still there? Have things turned around? That doesn't
necessarily have an answer."

He said only the passage of time and clear evidence that young sheep are being
born into the remaining herds would lead to transplants back into those areas.

A sheep plan

Weatherly says FNAWS and Fish, Wildlife & Parks are in the preliminary steps
of writing a statewide sheep management plan.

"We have finished the elk plan and all these other plans and we are saying 'me
too,'" he said. "Right now we don't have any other areas that are set up and
available to put sheep. We are looking at a couple new areas. Perhaps we could
have the Pryors (far southeastern Montana) ready for next year and possibly
put more sheep back into the Highlands (south of Butte).

Kujala says FWP commissioners have discussed the bighorn issue and they may
consider issuing more ewe permits.

"Certainly that is a possibility," he said. "The Legislature is looking at
reducing ewe tag prices in the event there are not enough applicants for the
number of licenses. And, what happens when we cannot find a release sight
anywhere?

"Certainly the public will influence us," he said. "The commissioners have the
final say but the Department is not throwing out either tool whether it be
trap and transplant or hunter harvest. Both have strong suits and limitations.


Reach Tribune Outdoor Editor Michael Babcock at
[email protected], at 406-791-1487 or 800-438-6600.
 
Dan Moore, the guy quoted in the article, goes by the handle BigDan on bowsite. He's been bitchin about it for weeks. Like the article states, there isn't much interest in hunting ewes so other than pure greed on the part of people like BigDan, I can't see how helping other states establish more herds is a bad thing.
 
MNHunter,

I agree with you 100%, the way we'll all get the opportunity to hunt sheep is by establishing populations in all the habitat that will support them...no matter what state.

You're also right on about Danny "pig" Moore. Unless he gets to kill it, he's against anything the MTFWP does. Has been that way longer than he's been applying for sheep tags. Theres people that I feel bad for when they've applied that long and have never drawn a tag...others, I dont feel too bad about.
 
I would hunt ewe's given the chance, but I guess I must be in the minority. Chit for $125 i'd take 2!!! I

The thing holding me back is loosing my 'prefrence' points to hunt a ewe. I think there are lots of hunters who are in the same boat. I'd fore go a point gained one year for a ewe tag. Jsut don't want to loose 5 points. I guess I'm really just kidding myself though. The odds of getting drawn are about zilch anyway...

I agree with Buzz too, lets get as many sheep on the ground as possible. Maybe just maybe I'll get to hunt sheep before I die...
 
I could probably do a little research and figure this out, but anybody know the average number of points it takes to draw a bighorn tag? I drew a Smith River permit this year with the odds stacked against me, don't know if that means it'll be a lucky year for drawing, or if I just wasted all my good luck on a float trip. :) We'll see.
 
Since MT points are just "bonus" points instead of true preference points, I don't think information on the average number of points successful applicants have is very useful.

The best way of looking at odds for a sheep hunt there would be if you knew how many "points" were in a particular drawing rather than how many applicants.
 
I've thought pretty long and hard about burning my 'points' on a ewe tag and then just going on an UL hunt for a few years. Just can't seem to find the time to get it all done though. Living on the East Coast sucks...
 
Bambistew, I've given a bit of thought to that as well. Years ago I shot a ewe in Colorado and thought it every bit as enjoyable as hunting for rams. Granted, the head gear is a bit lighter on the pack out, but the meat is great and at least I'm out hunting!
A 1 in 1000 chance at a ram tag in the Breaks, or a sure thing every few years to chase ewes... makes me think twice when I fill out that MT app.

As for the transplants, I would say they should increase the ewe permits by 10 or 20 and transplant the remaining 180. This way the residents get a benefit and the expansion of sheep range is also achieved.
 
I thought this article showed how FWP has a tough time keeping everyone happy. A good article like this goes a long way towards clearing up some mis-conceptions. Still you're not going to please everyone.

Buzz,

I hope your views on Jim have softened a little. He's a heck of a hard worker for sheep and wildlife in general.

Ithaca,

Montana has given Hells Canyon sheep in the past and will no doubt give some more. Get going on getting those domestic allotments retired. Get involved with ID FNAWS again. Hells Canyon is THE place in the U. S. with the most potential for Wild Sheep. So get it done!
 
I've thought pretty long and hard about burning my 'points' on a ewe tag and then just going on an UL hunt for a few years. Just can't seem to find the time to get it all done though. Living on the East Coast sucks...

Ivan, pretty sure you won't lose your points on a ewe tag. I believe if you draw your ewe tag, even as a first choice, you maintain your prior points, but do not collect one from that year. You do not want to do this more that two years as you lose your points if not purchasing for more than 2 years in a row. This is foggy in my memory, but I think that is correct. You might watch to check it out. I don't think the regs spell it out, but do mention
An applicant who receives a limited either sex or legal
ram license
is not eligible to apply for or receive
another bighorn sheep license for the next succeeding
seven years. For example, if you received one of the
limited either sex or legal ram bighorn sheep licenses
in 2000, you may not receive or apply for another
bighorn sheep license until 2008.

Maybe you still lose your points, but don't have to sit out. Hell, I don't know, but typed this much, so I will post it. Educate me if I am way off.:D
 
I dont' think you can draw a first choice tag regardless of ewe or ram and not loose/use your points. I can't remember is there a box that you can check to use your points?

Can't happen this year, but maybe next. I'd definatly fore go a point for a ewe tag. Something to quench the thirst so to speak for another uh... 8 years. I think it was in 99 that I had an UL tag, and that was after 8 years of frustration before that. :D They shut the unit down the next year IIRC. Been threatening to go again in another unit, but just don't have the time to get that many hunts in. Stupid work...
 
In 1991 there were 40 either sex/ram tags available on the Rocky Mt. Front. And there were 80 ewe tags avaiable. Units 421, 422, 423, 424 and 441. For a total of 120 available permits. In 2005 there were only 18 eithersex/ram tags and 33 ewe tags. A loss of 87 opportunities to hunt sheep. That was just in the five areas. Across the state I think in 1991 there were close to 160 either sex permits and 210 ewe permits. In 2002 there were only 124 either sex and 61 ewe permits. Quite a difference. I visited with MR. Kujala for several hours, wondering why they continued to trap and transplant to other states when hunting opportunities were being lost here at home. The winters along the Front in Montana have been mild since 1991 and we haven't lost any habitat from oil and gass development so I wondered if sheep numbers on the Front were dropping due to predators or if FWP was just lowering permit numbers so they could transplant more? ? ? Obviously you can't trap from one unit on the Front and put them into an adjacent unit and expect them to stay there, but they have also trapped from the Breaks and Missoula areas and could move some of those sheep back to the Front. I asked Mr. Kujala if we were raising sheep to transplant or to hunt. And being a good govt. employee he wouldn't really give me an answer. The discussion for hunting ewes is complex. If FWP would lower price and not take bonus points it would probly help. Montana's bonus points are really just a joke anyway. It just gives you an extra chance per year you put in, but since everyone started at the same time there is not really any advantage. Esply when the odds to draw are so tough. But in my opinion an opportunity to hunt lost to transplant is not a good option. The cost to raise sheep is so expensive it really burns me that Montana gives our sheep away. At least Colorado get Moose for theirs.
 
VJ,

According to the 2005 draw stats there was 45 Sun River ewe tags available with only 33 takers. No nonresidents applied either. And that was when a ewe tag cost $75. You also cherry picked 91 as your base year. A year where a lot of tags were given out, probably in an attempt to get the populations under control. Why don't you provide a 20 year average?

Many consider the Sun River sheep to be of some of the best bighorn genetics. Transplants from this herd include Upper Rock Creek, Thompson Falls, Anaconda, and the Breaks. VJ, wouldn't you like to share the superior Sun River bighorn genetics with other parts of the country as well? If a huge die off occurred, wouldn't it be smart to have Sun River sheep in a widely distributed areas around the country?
 
Now take it easy on old VJ. He's just cranky that he can't draw a tag and gets really mad when sheep biologists tell him that they really like non-residents since they bring in more $$. :D

I understand being mad that the FWP is removing sheep via transplant vs. issuing more tags. But, if the herd is over population objectives, and hunters don't want to shoot ewes, then transplant seems to be the best option.

VJ - you coming to CO this weekend? Give me a shout.
 
I couldn't agree more. If hunters don't want to harvest ewes then by all means transplant. But let's transplant back onto the Front before we give them away to other states. According to the late Duncan Gilcrest the sheep from the Front have the best genetics and were the bases for alot of the super rams that have come from Anaconda/Highlands/Missouri Breaks. I didn't cherry pick the year 1991, it was just the first year I started keeping track. Looking back at hunt regs. in the year 1990 there were a total of 195 either sex permits vs the 159 of 1991. We haven't come close to a die off on the Front as they continue to transplant out of the one unit and drop the number of permits on the others. No loss of habitat and the local lion hunters are lobbying for less cats to be taken.
 
In 89 the Sun River units gave out 25 either sex and 40 ewe tags. Last year they gave out 18 either sex and 45 ewe tags. Not a lot of difference between those years. Ram (or either sex) tags are calculated as a percentage of observed class 4 rams from their population surveys. If a unit has a ewe harvest it is because the unit is over it's population objectives. I understand that drought has been severe in that particular part of the state for many years now. Could that be having an effect on the habitat?
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
113,567
Messages
2,025,359
Members
36,235
Latest member
Camillelynn
Back
Top