Thanks. i see 417-20 (either sex) going from 100 to 200. I’m sure that was done to appease the outfitters. Not a big deal to me, again if the goal is to reduce the population. Would have preferred B tag increase only, but I have to be realistic.
Not going to get into a pissing match with you over the quality or use of roads in that district. If you hunt there consistently I would take your word over mine own, and I am happy to tell everyone to hit Knox Ridge and two Calf to shoot their big bulls.
You are right that the access to where the elk are is poor, I apologize for picking nits like that.
It was an absolutely incredible elk unit not that long ago, and with 200-400 bull tags being used primarily on public land, it's going to be an even bigger joke than what it's been lately. I just can't wrap my head around how FWP consistently responds to too many elk on private land by increasing the hunting pressure on public.
Also sorry to be so confrontational. I'm just so sick and tired of being pissed on and getting told that it's raining.