Danny,
While I agree Trump is not as elegant with his words as some politicians, he is currently the only candidate who has been supportive of firearms and public lands. The public lands issue is actually quite controversial, so coming out against the transfer or sale of these lands is actually something the republican party probably doesn't like. I'm not 100% on the Trump bandwagon but currently we are in too bad of a situation to even think of voting for Cruz or Rubio who have absolutely made it clear they are for the transfer, especially Cruz. I believe Trump Jr. is very sincere in what he says and has been consistent with it, even after Cruz has bashed his father multiple times over the issue. I really think the public lands issue is not something Donald Trump thinks about much, but his son thinks about it a lot, and it would be nice to have a candidate on the right get nominated who hasn't said he supports the transfer or sale. It's much better than a man who has made it a part of his campaign and has said he will transfer or sale as much public land as possible if he is elected president. If Trump is the republican nominee our public lands are in a better position than if Cruz does. I don't think anyone is saying we are all together happy with the nominees.
Also Washington Hunter to prove a point you should find somewhere in the middle. Conservative Treehouse is as far right as the the liberal media is far left. Trump isn't scared of controversy, some people like that, some people hate that. I personally don't care if he throws insults, the other candidates have done it as well, and the world isn't a padded room filled with pillows. Like Trump's approach or hate it, he has the best stand on the right side of isle and I will take him over the rest of them, even if what he says is sometimes controversial. Better than the classic candidates who speak eloquently and then get into office and are nothing but a paid for politician.
While I agree Trump is not as elegant with his words as some politicians, he is currently the only candidate who has been supportive of firearms and public lands. The public lands issue is actually quite controversial, so coming out against the transfer or sale of these lands is actually something the republican party probably doesn't like. I'm not 100% on the Trump bandwagon but currently we are in too bad of a situation to even think of voting for Cruz or Rubio who have absolutely made it clear they are for the transfer, especially Cruz. I believe Trump Jr. is very sincere in what he says and has been consistent with it, even after Cruz has bashed his father multiple times over the issue. I really think the public lands issue is not something Donald Trump thinks about much, but his son thinks about it a lot, and it would be nice to have a candidate on the right get nominated who hasn't said he supports the transfer or sale. It's much better than a man who has made it a part of his campaign and has said he will transfer or sale as much public land as possible if he is elected president. If Trump is the republican nominee our public lands are in a better position than if Cruz does. I don't think anyone is saying we are all together happy with the nominees.
Also Washington Hunter to prove a point you should find somewhere in the middle. Conservative Treehouse is as far right as the the liberal media is far left. Trump isn't scared of controversy, some people like that, some people hate that. I personally don't care if he throws insults, the other candidates have done it as well, and the world isn't a padded room filled with pillows. Like Trump's approach or hate it, he has the best stand on the right side of isle and I will take him over the rest of them, even if what he says is sometimes controversial. Better than the classic candidates who speak eloquently and then get into office and are nothing but a paid for politician.
