I mentioned this earlier, sometimes it takes the nutters to set the stage for SCOTUS rulings such as the whackjobs protesting Military funerals... And now our 1st Amendment has been strengthened. They set the stage specifically for that intent. I don't agree one bit with them just as this nut job Tanner.
However, I don't believe he should be subject to F&G "reasonable" search and seizure as a person not involved with fishing or hunting activity. *This is based on my internet yammered opinion and a simple article.
Also civil or criminal precedence is significant for future cases.
SCOTUS focused legal firms specifically search for cases that could be taken all the way. If not SCOTUS at least to the Appellate 9th Circuit.
However, I don't believe he should be subject to F&G "reasonable" search and seizure as a person not involved with fishing or hunting activity. *This is based on my internet yammered opinion and a simple article.
Also civil or criminal precedence is significant for future cases.
SCOTUS focused legal firms specifically search for cases that could be taken all the way. If not SCOTUS at least to the Appellate 9th Circuit.