thusby
Well-known member
Hey they finally sent me an online survey for the antelope 799-30 tag they gave me last year. It's a a start.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My money says little or no change. I remember getting the survey in the mail. No idea of sample size. mtmuleyIt would also be interesting to have a repeat on the survey to see how much opinions have changed in the last 10 years.
1,980 respondents so a decent sample size. I think someone pointed out that it's a ten year old survey though and that's probably more concerning than sample size. I didn't realize it was that dated.I believe it was a relatively small sample size as well. That is going off memory talking to the biologist at a check station. Nobody I know got the survey.
Walkalot, you are on the right track with the "How bout just do what is best for the wildlife." When sportsman argue for more mature bucks or bigger antlers they have a ceiling of support according to the survey of less than 40%. Argue for the health herds and you will get much better support.Idk alot of people i know want change, if its season structure or all le. I think its gonna take alot of pissed off hunters, conservationist, and a few privileged ranchers. Yes the breaks are the modern day Yellowstone units. If we let them they will run that too. Really there has to be a good solution. How bout just do what is best for the wildlife.
This is already happening. As more and more units in western MT are going LE the pressure is being shifted to other near by units and east. Like you said with devastating results for those units. Soon support builds for the hardest hit units to go LE and when they do the cycle repeats. The only real question is are we going to bit the bullet and go all LE or just implement LE slowly across the state from west to east.Keeping some units otc and creating a bunch of le units just shifts a ton of hunters to the otc units which decimates those areas.
FWP may well be pleased that 63% chose option one and 37% chose option two. Given the parameters of the question so should proponent so LE. Thirty seven percent choosing limited entry is far more than I would have expected. In this question limited entry is getting to hunt mule deer every four years. If we need to cut pressure on mule deer to 1/4 of the pressure of 10 years ago to fix what is ailing the mule deer herd we have big problems. I am no bio, but I just do not see were LE would have to be that limiting in all but the most popular units. I would expect reducing pressure to every other year or even 2 out of 3 years or LE the last three weeks of Nov. would result a big improvement in herd health. If 37% are willing to go to once every four years a much less restrictive LE may well have greater than 50% support.Montana fwp gets the answer they want and the biologists have drank the kool-aid. Cwd will further complicate any change to current management
Giving only ONE CHOICE, which of the following would be most favorable to you in Montana as a whole?
The opportunity to hunt mule deer every year somewhere in Montana (with a lower probability of harvesting a mature buck)
or
The opportunity to hunt mule deer once every several years somewhere in Montana (with a higher probability of harvesting a mature buck)
Do u have these tags in hand ? U applied/bought for a area 2/3 way across the country that you know nothing about and copy and paste it all over the internet and you expect to get solid advise ? Cmon manA little off topic but any advise on Region 3 hunting for Whitetail and Elk B-Licenses? I've never been to Montana and I will be traveling from Louisiana.