James Riley
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2015
- Messages
- 1,821
Isn't the argument for Bears Ears the greater good and support for the tribal heritage? If that's truly the case we should seek ways to protect these sites on private lands across this country.
That's illogical. You don't extrapolate from the specific to the general; you refine from the general to the specific.
As to the 100k, as Leopold said, the first sign of intelligent tinkering is to keep all the parts. Or, as Doc would say, first do no harm. If it later turns out that the action was not warranted, then Congress is free to un-do the designation. As said before, it's all still there if you or your heirs want to rape it. That's the benefit of savings accounts: they ain't spent. Yet.
Last edited: