Both of these are damned nice boots. Lots of subtle and not so subtle differences though.
The Hoffman’s are stiffer. A little softer than a Lowa Tibet, pretty similar to the Zamberlan Guide 960 boots I was wearing. The Schnee’s are similar to the Crispi Colorado in terms of stiffness.
The Hoffman’s feel a little more robust in terms of leather and construction. Tread is very similar. The Hoffman’s have fewer seams and seem less likely to wear out in the front of the tongue area.
The Schnee’s are a little narrower in the toe box, both across and up and down. My big toe contacted the top of the toe box, and I could see this being an issue after a long day of slogging.
The lace lock mechanism on the Schnee’s is nice, but I could see it being a pain the ass at times.
The Hoffman’s will require a little more break in, and also feel more supportive and solid through the ankle.
Hoffman’s are the winner.