Covid-19 fact

azelkhntr

azelkhntr

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 21, 2020
Messages
456
This virus is so small; 0.01nm that it can’t be avoided period. We’re all having smoke blown up our butts by people who either are capitalizing on this or are just plain ignorant. All masks are useless against it. Even the N95 only filters down to 0.03nm. If your neighbor coughs while outside 2 miles away and the winds blowing your direction you’re going to get it. Its nanoscopic and long lived airborne. This societal/political response is absolute madness in light of this fact. We’ll be better off just letting it naturally run it’s course and let the brains develop a vaccine. $2.2 trillion wasted and the debt dumped on our great grand children. Madness.
 
Maybe there are some closed public land toilets somewhere in AZ that some one with this much time on their hands can volunteer to swab out.
I'm sure at least one or two like minded individuals would appreciate the service.....................
 
Actually, the virus is .06-.14 microns and a 3m n95 mask will filter down to .007 microns if memory serves me.
 
azelkhntr said:
This virus is so small; 0.01nm that it can’t be avoided period. We’re all having smoke blown up our butts by people who either are capitalizing on this or are just plain ignorant. All masks are useless against it. Even the N95 only filters down to 0.03nm. If your neighbor coughs while outside 2 miles away and the winds blowing your direction you’re going to get it. Its nanoscopic and long lived airborne. This societal/political response is absolute madness in light of this fact. We’ll be better off just letting it naturally run it’s course and let the brains develop a vaccine. $2.2 trillion wasted and the debt dumped on our great grand children. Madness.
Click to expand...

Citations? More specifically, scientific citations.
 
Last edited:
Quackillr said:
If you wrap your head in toilet paper and pour fish tank cleaner on it, I heard it had a filtration rate of .000000001 microns. And it will kill the virus on contact.
Click to expand...
That explains so much....
 
I'm sure our handful of experts from the Randy11 covid-19 thread will confirm or confront this for us
 
wllm1313 said:
That explains so much....
Click to expand...

Actually, the op is technically sorta somewhat correct other than the hyperbole.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Performance of N95 respirators: filtration efficiency for airborne microbial and inert particles - PubMed

In 1995 the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health issued new regulations for nonpowered particulate respirators (42 CFR Part 84). A new filter certification system also was created. Among the new particulate respirators that have entered the market, the N95 respirator is the most...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov


But

smartairfilters.com

Can Masks Capture Coronavirus Particles? – Smart Air

Can N95 and surgical masks capture coronavirus particles? Scientists shot nanoparticles at masks and found they captured particles even 10 times smaller.
smartairfilters.com

It’s actually a interesting subject, in my industry we use n95 as a minimum for protection of long term occupational exposure, It’s well known that the rate of protection is not even close to 100%, proper fit is essential, beards, etc.. yes it reduces risk but it doesn’t eliminate it. As I’ve said in another post I’m surprised people working with infectious disease are using this minimal amount of respiratory protection, I’m sure there is some logic/scientific data to it but I haven’t really been bored enough to look for it.

I just listen to the “experts”
 
Last edited:
"Actually, the op is technically somewhat correct,..."

I read the rest of this thing - whew - I was afraid these words applied to this part:

"If your neighbor coughs while outside 2 miles away and the winds blowing your direction you’re going to get it".

Sucks that BS like this circulates amidst the more sobering realities.........
 
onpoint said:
"Actually, the op is technically somewhat correct,..."

I read the rest of this thing - whew - I was afraid these words applied to this part:

"If your neighbor coughs while outside 2 miles away and the winds blowing your direction you’re going to get it".

Sucks that BS like this circulates amidst the more sobering realities.........
Click to expand...

Caught me before I was done editing.

I don’t want to speculate, but my guess is the statistical probability of catching this from a neighbor sneezing 2 miles away is a number somewhere between 1-9 with a lot of zeros between it and the decimal point of a percent.
 
Quackillr said:
Caught me before I was done editing.

I don’t want to speculate, but my guess is the statistical probability of catching this from a neighbor sneezing 2 miles away is a number somewhere between 1-9 with a lot of zeros between it and the decimal point of a percent.
Click to expand...

I forgot the insertion(s) of - :ROFLMAO: - this thing in key areas of my useless reply......

my bad
 
The point is the C-19 is unavoidable and there exists no available prophylactic protection against it. It’ll probably be 9-12 months before a vaccine is available. But if laughing at me makes you feel better ok. You’re still going to get it most likely no matter what.
 
azelkhntr said:
The point is the C-19 is unavoidable and there exists no available prophylactic protection against it. It’ll probably be 9-12 months before a vaccine is available. But if laughing at me makes you feel better ok. You’re still going to get it most likely no matter what.
Click to expand...
I don’t think many have debated that most everyone will eventually get it. But there are some huge upsides to slowing the rate of infection and that should be the goal of everybody.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
GOHUNT Insider

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
114,009
Messages
2,041,025
Members
36,429
Latest member
Dusky

Share this page

Back
Top