LopeHunter
Well-known member
I think the media coverup days here are coming to an end. They pretty much show everything on TV, even the Hong Kong beatings. The virus news is pretty much 24/7 with a break for Kobe stuff. Death rate is up to 3% which is getting up there. But as mentioned flus take many lives every year esp elderly. The 1918 flu had ~20% death rate. Bad thing about this one seems it’s spreading very fast. Been here 7 times but I’ve never seen the streets so deserted. People avoiding contact. Don’t know if it matters but I did get a flu shot this year at my doctors office.
3% is likely understated? Why? They are doing simple math. How many dead vs how many infected. But, the number infected today do not die for say two more weeks so the number dead should be compared to how many infected two weeks ago (or however long from symptoms presenting until death). If number of infected is doubling each week then two weeks ago implies over 10% death rate. I can live (pun intended) with 3% rate as likely those deaths are people with serious health issues prior to contracting coronavirus so death happened a bit prematurely. 10% death rate implies some otherwise reasonable healthy people are not surviving the virus.
I appreciate the calls for keeping things in perspective but I am not confident China is fully reporting cases of deaths and infection. In 6 months when we have 10,000s of cases here in America then will have confidence on what the death rate is. A buddy at lunch mentioned he wondered if would put meth heads at risk if they contract the virus.