the nikster
Well-known member
Hey California,
I understand California likes to promote itself as the most firearms restrictive state.
How well did those restrictions work in this case?
Is it possible that 'bad guys' don't give a rat's ass about the laws? Is it possible your plan will take firearms out of the hands of those who intend to defend themselves against such criminals?
California is Bankrupt-both financially and morally. Their state has more debt than any other. Theirs are the most restrictive gun laws in the country. They are the most tolerant of EVERY screwball social/moral demographic out there.
Cali may enact further legislation and this will continue to happen. Will it then be up to Oregon and Nevada and Arizona to enect similar or be held responsible?
I guess I just wanted to point out that the bad guys don't follow rules today any more than they did before the last legislative volley.
I understand California likes to promote itself as the most firearms restrictive state.
How well did those restrictions work in this case?
Is it possible that 'bad guys' don't give a rat's ass about the laws? Is it possible your plan will take firearms out of the hands of those who intend to defend themselves against such criminals?
California is Bankrupt-both financially and morally. Their state has more debt than any other. Theirs are the most restrictive gun laws in the country. They are the most tolerant of EVERY screwball social/moral demographic out there.
Cali may enact further legislation and this will continue to happen. Will it then be up to Oregon and Nevada and Arizona to enect similar or be held responsible?
I guess I just wanted to point out that the bad guys don't follow rules today any more than they did before the last legislative volley.