antelopedundee
Well-known member
It’s not the caliber that is funny- it’s that the rifle ‘now identifies’.
C’mon man...![]()
The rifle has good taste in calibers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s not the caliber that is funny- it’s that the rifle ‘now identifies’.
C’mon man...![]()
They say the pain is not so much the surgery as the cut in pay....apologies in advance, I'll go sit in the corner.It’s not the caliber that is funny- it’s that the rifle ‘now identifies’.
C’mon man...![]()
This is also "my" unwritten rule at the point of impact. In addition, the minimum velocity of the bullet to effectively expand.I'd really love to have a discussions about what good velocity and energy numbers should be rather than the actual caliber.
I appreciated the "1800 ft.lbs for good bullet expansion" comment in the article. I think if we focused on getting there on caliber selection it could be a little more civil.
A commonly accepted threshold for the minimum amount of kinetic energy needed to kill an elk is 1500 ft-lbs. For whitetail deer, the minimum amount of kinetic energy is 1000 ft-lbs.