antelopedundee
Well-known member
It’s not the caliber that is funny- it’s that the rifle ‘now identifies’.
C’mon man...
The rifle has good taste in calibers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s not the caliber that is funny- it’s that the rifle ‘now identifies’.
C’mon man...
They say the pain is not so much the surgery as the cut in pay....apologies in advance, I'll go sit in the corner.It’s not the caliber that is funny- it’s that the rifle ‘now identifies’.
C’mon man...
This is also "my" unwritten rule at the point of impact. In addition, the minimum velocity of the bullet to effectively expand.I'd really love to have a discussions about what good velocity and energy numbers should be rather than the actual caliber.
I appreciated the "1800 ft.lbs for good bullet expansion" comment in the article. I think if we focused on getting there on caliber selection it could be a little more civil.
A commonly accepted threshold for the minimum amount of kinetic energy needed to kill an elk is 1500 ft-lbs. For whitetail deer, the minimum amount of kinetic energy is 1000 ft-lbs.