Gerald Martin
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2009
- Messages
- 8,643
No one is forcing public hunting on any private landowners.Landowner tags are going to happen just need to minimize the damage. The sooner people realize they will never get to hunt private the better. Public hunters are nothing but a nuisance to private land. It’s not going to work out how you think.
But if a private landowner wants public compensation for the damage that public trust wildlife causes they need to be willing to be part of the solution or bear the cost.
The private landowner is the one who chose to conduct his business in an area that had wildlife long before his business started. If he wants the benefit he can bear the cost.
If he wants to share the cost or have the public bear the burden for wildlife he must share the benefit.
Some ranchers and landowners are amazing stewards of wildlife and work great with the public.
Some ranchers and landowners are entitled whiners who want the benefits of wildlife and none of the cost. The latter group are the ones raising the biggest ruckus and driving the political “solutions” imposed by the MT legislature.
It’s past time that MT hunters start raising a bigger ruckus than the current ruckus raisers and advocate for our interests.
I honestly don’t care if a landowner doesn’t grant me permission to hunt. I also don’t care if the deer and elk eat that same landowner into bankruptcy.
I do sympathize with the folks who live close to sanctuary properties and suffer wildlife depredation because of their neighbor’s approach to wildlife management. However, they need to work that out with their neighbors, not ask their legislators to impose management policies that harm all the hunters in that unit without solving their depredation problems.
The hard truth is that some landowners will never be free from deer and elk damage because neighboring properties will never allow enough access to reduce populations in the immediate area.