VikingsGuy
Well-known member
The intent of next gen nuclear is not to reduce the safety standards or oversight, but that by standardizing and modularizing inherently fault tolerant devices you reduce the "bespoke regulation" that is the current reality and adds greatly to cost and slows roll out. Essentially every nuclear facility in the last gen is a bespoke, "designed in place" facility that in turn resulted in a great deal of bespoke, on the fly regulatory oversight which contributed to significant cost over runs. Heavy regulation in and of itself adds nothing to safety. It is proper and effective regulation that does that. Next gen nuclear is trying to learn from the "design/build/regulate on the fly" approach that has failed. Get the right regulatory framework baked in and then roll out subject to proper oversight. Part of this will require that some federal regulations need to pre-empt any state "piling on" after design and sign-off is complete. There is no carbon solution in reality without nuclear, but there will be those that try to use the wheels of federal litigation to block next gen nukes - this needs to be stopped in the bud.While I realize that nuclear power is the only source really capable of replacing hydrocarbons, I am leery of giving companies a less self inflicted regulatory environment in which to operate.