Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not knowledgable enough to fully understand the environmental negatives and positives with electric cars vs. gas cars. I remember reading that Tesla recycles their batteries, so is the only impact with extraction?
Based on my limited knowledge, I always thought that the impact of fossil fuels was much greater.
I'm sure it really depends on who you cut it, like anything it's very difficult an apples to apples comparison. I'm not trying to wiggle out of my statement, more just saying I lack the knowledge to accurately discuss the full environmental of building a Tesla. But in broad terms
1. American car, probably runs on gas or diesel produced domestically, transport from well head to refinery to vehicle is under 2000 miles... worst case.
2. Tesla, battery built out of material mined in Africa shipped to the US, electricity generated to run car is likely from either a coal or NG plant. In terms of power generated per BTU of OG product it's less efficient to: burn NG to create electricity then transport it through the grid to your house to your car, than to just burn that amount of petroleum in your car directly. A huge amount of electricity is lost in the grid. Obviously some areas have a higher % of power generated by renewable. But just because you are driving an electric vehicle doesn't necessarily mean it doesn't require petroleum to power it.
I'm not anti-electric, I just want the conversation to be honest.
Here is some info on Tesla batteries... pretty cool 60% is a decent amount of recovery in my mind.
https://medium.com/tradr/teslas-app...uture-for-sustainable-production-5af99b62aa0e
agreed.
I would have solar panels if I could afford them.
It always seems like the two choices are between the lesser of two evils.
I would never buy residential solar, especially if you can’t participate in net metering, until home battery prices get to a point that you can economically store the energy you produce. Otherwise you’re just overloading the grid mid day when you’re not home and drawing from it when you’re not producing anything. It’s called the ‘Duck Curve’ if anybody wants to look that term up and look at the graphs.
. A new all night power demand on the grid could actually be quite useful.
WLLM touches some good points. We can’t call our nuclear energy renewable because it consumes mined uranium that results in spent uranium. We can call it clean because it emits zero carbon, but not renewable
Solar panels can be called renewable, although they consume raw mined metals like rare earths and also result in spent panels at the end of their lives.
It’s a weird thing.
For example, It’s pretty easy to make the case that electricity produced from natural gas, which otherwise would be flared off as an oil biproduct is the greenest energy around.
At the end of the day, you’re just plugging your Tesla into whatever your electric source is. For many of you, that’s coal.
Tesla’s appeal to me is more their speed, and how cheap they are to ‘fill up’ especially when you can charge at work or at home at night during peak rates.
I would never buy residential solar, especially if you can’t participate in net metering, until home battery prices get to a point that you can economically store the energy you produce. Otherwise you’re just overloading the grid mid day when you’re not home and drawing from it when you’re not producing anything. It’s called the ‘Duck Curve’ if anybody wants to look that term up and look at the graphs.
If electric is the future, I feel fortunate to have witnessed the making of obscene and unnecessary horsepower and torque from internal combustion engines. Both gas and diesel. Good stuff, and I owned a super fast one once.I think it's pretty cool that even the new mid-engined Corvette still has a pushrod V-8. And spanks the Euros. Electric is not for me. mtmuleyI've seen a guy pull a train car with his teeth, so not blown away quite yet.
Future is coming.