VikingsGuy
Well-known member
My wife and 17-year-old son are planning a hiking trip to Alaska next summer for 10 or so days. They will not be fishing or hunting, just hiking. They would like to be somewhat remote but don't want to burn up their whole trip waiting on bush pilots etc. They also are looking at a mix of lodging and camping and would prefer to get gear on-site rather than fly their stuff in from MN. They have hiked and camped all over MN and the Big Horns in WY several times, but have never been to Alaska or in truly desolate places. They are both in good shape, but we are flat landers. Their stated goal is to enjoy the experience and see a new part of the world, and other than walking on a glacier they really don't have any particular must-haves. They have been trying to do a little planning but there is so much space and so many options they asked if I would post a question for them. If they had to focus on one range for the type of trip described above, should they focus on the Brooks range or Denali range? I know this is a broad ask and your answers could take them a dozen different directions, but they just don't have much more direction at this point. I assume once they pick a range they will then be able to focus their thoughts a little (and likely have more specific questions).
Thanks.
Thanks.