Dinkshooter
Well-known member
Guys are still whining about the best mule deer hunting in the US, for $50 permits? Why am I not surprised?
I'm unclear if the whining is about that or spending $75 to get to hunt a state with 270,000 elk?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Guys are still whining about the best mule deer hunting in the US, for $50 permits? Why am I not surprised?
Even at minimum wage, all these guys (sniveling about a $20 increase in a deer permit) could have earned enough to cover their family's total price increases AND new Rocky boots for all, had they spent their time shoveling snow instead of whining on this thread.I'm unclear if the whining is about that or spending $75 to get to hunt a state with 270,000 elk?
Even at minimum wage, all these guys (sniveling about a $20 increase in a deer permit) could have earned enough to cover their family's total price increases AND new Rocky boots for all, had they spent their time shoveling snow instead of whining on this thread.
Seriously a good shovel can run you $5 more than a CO resident deer tag, things are crazy out there in the tool world. I'm probably going to have to give up shoveling because of the cost... hopefully there are some other residents of CO to take my place.
View attachment 68522
That shovel will run you about 700 bucks in Colorado.![]()
That shovel will run you about 700 bucks in Colorado.![]()
Boo whoo!!! About time Colorado residents pull their weight and increase the fee on residents instead of breaking the backs and pocketbooks of non-residents. Every single year they raise the fee on non resident hunters with no rhyme or reason. I have zero sympathy for you and I think you whining about it is a absolute joke! You can get TWO deer tags in Wisconsin for $80 as a first time buyer and $180 every time after that! Plus each doe tag after that is $20!! You get now sympathy from me. Time for colorado residents to pull their weight!
Not in Wisconsin....we have tons of acres of public land! If you are wise and look into pieces of land that are "private" but open to hunting you can get into some huge huge whitetail bucks! All for the low low price of a $80 NR tag as a first time buyer or $170 every year after that. That tag includes one buck and one doe.
Why so much vitriol?
I'm unclear if the whining is about that or spending $75 to get to hunt a state with 270,000 elk?
I'm pretty sure you're smart enough to figure out that the tag increase has nothing to do with elk and how CPW manages them. I think the fisheries program really appreciates any increase in tag prices, R or NR.
It amazes me that the holier than thou don't understand it has nothing to do with the minimal increase, but how the money is spent. Maybe if CPW spent the money on ELK it wouldn't be an issue.
So you're saying the CPW should be split apart into different agencies to separately manage deer, elk, antelope, birds, rabbits, fish, maybe a separate entity to manage a park where non hunters and non fisherman can take their kids? Just so your $$$ are not allowed to be used for anything other than elk? Ridiculous.
1. Several people have indicated they don't like how the CPW is spending their budget, but I have not seen any concrete examples. Can someone provide a link to actual data they don't like or a news article reflecting the same?
2. $50 is less than the tank of gas to get to just about any hunting spot. It's hardly worth mentioning, much less complaining about.