MTNTOUGH - Use promo code RANDY for 30 days free

2024 College Football šŸˆ Season starts tomorrowā€¦. Yee Yee

Djfan said:
I have to tell you that this format has really made it fun for me. The championship run is very exciting and a bit unpredictable. Most of the games you could see coming, but ND winning caught me off guard. I thought Oregon had more, and really didn't pay attention to Scattebo much until this game.

Super fun.
Click to expand...
Welcome to what every other NCAA sport - including FCS football - have known for 50 years. The old bowl system is a dinosaur.
 
TN2shot07 said:
Iā€™m sure Iā€™m in the minority but I absolutely disagree. We had an entire round of terrible games, tv ratings back that. Itā€™s rare that there would be 8 teams that should realistically play for a national title, much less 12 or the 16 that weā€™re probably headed for. I donā€™t want Cinderella in the playoffs, I want to see the best on best. It shouldnā€™t be about inclusion and who ā€œdeservesā€ a chance.
Click to expand...
Ok, lets say it was just 4 teams picked like in years past. Your playoff field of 4 would have been: 1=Oregon, 2=Georgia, 3=Texas and 4=Penn St.

Only Texas and Penn St. remain and both Oregon and Georgia got their butts kicked by a team you are claiming was just "deserving a chance".

I agree that from the 12 teams, there are a few that fell flat.

Boise State was clearly not of the same caliber and seemed outmatched however Jeanty was shut down and that was their team. So either props to Penn St. or shame on Jeanty and the O line for not showing up to play.

SMU got man handled by Penn St. Is it coincidence that both of these teams that fell flat faced Penn St. and maybe Penn St. is just that good? We will see but they sure do look tough to beat. #44 is a beast.

Indiana. They only got here because for the first 3/4 of the season they played crappy teams although in a good conference. I didn't like Indiana getting in to the playoffs in the first place and it showed. Notre Dame made easy work of that sub par team.
 
seeth07 said:
Ok, lets say it was just 4 teams picked like in years past. Your playoff field of 4 would have been: 1=Oregon, 2=Georgia, 3=Texas and 4=Penn St.

Only Texas and Penn St. remain and both Oregon and Georgia got their butts kicked by a team you are claiming was just "deserving a chance".

I agree that from the 12 teams, there are a few that fell flat.

Boise State was clearly not of the same caliber and seemed outmatched however Jeanty was shut down and that was their team. So either props to Penn St. or shame on Jeanty and the O line for not showing up to play.

SMU got man handled by Penn St. Is it coincidence that both of these teams that fell flat faced Penn St. and maybe Penn St. is just that good? We will see but they sure do look tough to beat. #44 is a beast.

Indiana. They only got here because for the first 3/4 of the season they played crappy teams although in a good conference. I didn't like Indiana getting in to the playoffs in the first place and it showed. Notre Dame made easy work of that sub par team.
Click to expand...
I donā€™t mind the 8 and no byes but I donā€™t think there would have been anything wrong with the 4 either (I do think they would be seeded differently for the games). I agree on Indiana, winning and strength of schedule have to be taken into account. The regular season should also matter. Ohio State is absolutely one of the most talented teams in the country but you need to show up every week, theyā€™re safe in the 8 anyway.
 
seeth07 said:
Ok, lets say it was just 4 teams picked like in years past. Your playoff field of 4 would have been: 1=Oregon, 2=Georgia, 3=Texas and 4=Penn St.

Only Texas and Penn St. remain and both Oregon and Georgia got their butts kicked by a team you are claiming was just "deserving a chance".

I agree that from the 12 teams, there are a few that fell flat.

Boise State was clearly not of the same caliber and seemed outmatched however Jeanty was shut down and that was their team. So either props to Penn St. or shame on Jeanty and the O line for not showing up to play.

SMU got man handled by Penn St. Is it coincidence that both of these teams that fell flat faced Penn St. and maybe Penn St. is just that good? We will see but they sure do look tough to beat. #44 is a beast.

Indiana. They only got here because for the first 3/4 of the season they played crappy teams although in a good conference. I didn't like Indiana getting in to the playoffs in the first place and it showed. Notre Dame made easy work of that sub par team.
Click to expand...

TN2shot07 said:
Iā€™m sure Iā€™m in the minority but I absolutely disagree. We had an entire round of terrible games, tv ratings back that. Itā€™s rare that there would be 8 teams that should realistically play for a national title, much less 12 or the 16 that weā€™re probably headed for. I donā€™t want Cinderella in the playoffs, I want to see the best on best. It shouldnā€™t be about inclusion and who ā€œdeservesā€ a chance.
Click to expand...
Eight, selected entirely on merit without regards to conference affiliation, is probably the right number to make sure all the true contenders are at the table. But it is right for the NCAA to think about the fun of the whole season - the more schools that think they might be team 12 or team 16 makes the whole regular season more fun and interesting. Hundreds of more games will be relevant and the only cost is one first week of playoffs that may be sub-optimal. And easy choice. Go with 16. Given the top 8 home playoff games. Shut down all the bowl games.
 
VikingsGuy said:
Eight, selected entirely on merit without regards to conference affiliation, is probably the right number to make sure all the true contenders are at the table. But it is right for the NCAA to think about the fun of the whole season - the more schools that think they might be team 12 or team 16 makes the whole regular season more fun and interesting. Hundreds of more games will be relevant and the only cost is one first week of playoffs that may be sub-optimal. And easy choice. Go with 16. Given the top 8 home playoff games. Shut down all the bowl games.
Click to expand...
I could get behind that plan if getting away from all those bowls was an option but we are adding games, not subtracting. This isnā€™t about football, whatā€™s fun or better games, itā€™s about money.
 
seeth07 said:
Ok, lets say it was just 4 teams picked like in years past. Your playoff field of 4 would have been: 1=Oregon, 2=Georgia, 3=Texas and 4=Penn St.

Only Texas and Penn St. remain and both Oregon and Georgia got their butts kicked by a team you are claiming was just "deserving a chance".

I agree that from the 12 teams, there are a few that fell flat.

Boise State was clearly not of the same caliber and seemed outmatched however Jeanty was shut down and that was their team. So either props to Penn St. or shame on Jeanty and the O line for not showing up to play.

SMU got man handled by Penn St. Is it coincidence that both of these teams that fell flat faced Penn St. and maybe Penn St. is just that good? We will see but they sure do look tough to beat. #44 is a beast.

Indiana. They only got here because for the first 3/4 of the season they played crappy teams although in a good conference. I didn't like Indiana getting in to the playoffs in the first place and it showed. Notre Dame made easy work of that sub par team.
Click to expand...
I think boise and some other non power conference schools can gain ground this way though. Boise would have been in this several years in a row - and would have probably only grown in talent.

I like this system because it gives 12 teams a chance to prove it. If we matched up 1 and 2 like bcs days - we would have got 2 teams that got manhandled.
 
VikingsGuy said:
Eight, selected entirely on merit without regards to conference affiliation, is probably the right number to make sure all the true contenders are at the table. But it is right for the NCAA to think about the fun of the whole season - the more schools that think they might be team 12 or team 16 makes the whole regular season more fun and interesting. Hundreds of more games will be relevant and the only cost is one first week of playoffs that may be sub-optimal. And easy choice. Go with 16. Given the top 8 home playoff games. Shut down all the bowl games.
Click to expand...
No. College football is regional. It would become entirely southern or midwestern in a hurry without some way to keep other conferences in.
 
Forkyfinder said:
No. College football is regional. It would become entirely southern or midwestern in a hurry without some way to keep other conferences in.
Click to expand...
Or the other conferences would pick up the pace. NIL could really help the Northeast and West Coast as way more disposable income for supporters to throw at football in those areas.
 
Forkyfinder said:
No. College football is regional. It would become entirely southern or midwestern in a hurry without some way to keep other conferences in.
Click to expand...
I think conference champs should still get a shot. But going off this year, ASU and BSU didn't deserve the buy. Top 4 ranked teams get a buy, keep the 12 team playoff with home field 1st round. My .02
 
All the talk about jeanty - he looked outstanding against oregon.... Players have bad games based on matchups sometimes too. Boise state was over matched by PSU up front on both sides of the ball by a big margin jeanty couldnt overcome. It happens, even to great players - Barry sanders made a career of it in the nfl.

Skatteboo didnt put up 100 on texas tech or texas state.
 
BigHornRam said:
Allright all you BLOWHARDS! We are down to 4 teams now. Who is going to win it all? I am going to pick/jinx Penn State.
Click to expand...
Was surprised to see the line on ND/PSU has ND -1.5. Heck, IU got within 10 pts.
Give me PSU/OSU in the final, and it pains me to say, but bucknuts by 17 in the championship.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
MTNTOUGH - Use promo code RANDY for 30 days free

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
114,179
Messages
2,047,087
Members
36,487
Latest member
therudder

Share this page

Back
Top