It's true, we did support it out of the first committee. Our board voted to support and it was a close vote. We quickly heard from our members and the greater community a quickly learned that was a mistake. We listened and we fought it after that. I wish others would follow that lesson in this case.
The tax address assumption is correct. It's not perfect, however it's great you ran your own GIS analysis and found numbers that were very close to the GIS reports commissioned by Montana BHA and MWF. Each were slightly different, but each under 600 and over 550. These GIS reports are likely the...
I think you are referring to a different data set. The GIS report we commissioned was to determine how many nonresident landowners owns 2500+ acres in Montana.
Are you referring to the draw wood for nonresidents in permitted areas?
Giving up Sweet Grass, lack of conservation easements, cutting and trading that NE corner of section 14 are all good reasons to oppose the proposal as written and I'd encourage folks to include those details in your comments.
However, giving up on Sweet Grass, lack of conservation easements...
https://www.backcountryhunters.org/opposing_east_crazies_land_swap_what_you_need_to_know
The Montana Chapter of Backcountry Hunters & Anglers shares the goal of solving public access issues into the east Crazy Mountains but only while retaining, in public hands, productive and protected public...
Another good article from Amanda at Montana Free Press
Forest Service unveils Crazy Mountains land swap proposal
https://montanafreepress.org/2022/11/17/forest-service-unveils-proposed-crazy-mountain-land-swap-montana/?fbclid=IwAR0ESipk6-8qjqx3CYmmeP0bQyKSJHFko5vlZ_UhOgi59tyfOfeQ62k7jzw
There...
sclancy27, Justin and I spoke big picture stuff and never discussed summer range vs winter range, therefore I did not mention those details in this HT thread. I asked specific questions about the lands being swapped (is there water, forage, etc.). He was very cautious and clear not to take a...
I understand your position but ask what solution does this proposal provide? Is a singular access point with a 22 mile trail better? Imagine the congestion. Is the swap of high-value low country lands for steeper less productive lands better? Is the loss of the last public sections on lower...
Is it really the best deal? Could you not hold the great lands the public owns, not cede the public trails to the landowners and negotiate a better and more equitable deal?
This proposal assumes the public owns nothing and is owed nothing and its being sold as a generous offer from the...
At this time the swap is simply a proposal from the USFS. The public comment period began on Nov 7th and ends on Dec 22nd. You can read the details and comment here: https://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=63115
The conservation community presented many solutions to the CGNF and YC in order to...
I spoke with FWP's Region 5 elk biologist about HD580 (that is the HD where the proposed land exchange will occur). He confirmed what already know: The public is losing the best elk habitat in this exchange. He was very careful not to take a position on the exchange. The fact is the exchange...
I did. After a lot of research PLWA remains opposed.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6002236795a3752c3a5420f6/t/63729e24b29b4457eb55ef8d/1668455972927/PLWA+Crazies+Letter+November+2022.pdf
"We agree that addressing critical issues through creation of the East Trunk Trail would be...
NEPA law is clear and it is certainly applicable in this case.
Show us the documents where the USFS changes their positions on these trails. I can provide a lot of evidence that they have not made a discrete decision to change their position.
I think you misunderstand our lawsuit and what...
Maybe you can explain why you created this thread before anyone knew what was in it...
Wouldn't it be ridiculous if I were serious? Coincidence, Rob, not conspiracy.
Rob
I'm sorry you did not understand the analogy about the damn. I did make clear it was not a parallel analogy.
"The Sweet Grass was purposely left unresolved so that if people want to resolve it, they can do so at any time." Purposely unresolved is the problem. The USFS still considers...
I thought about your comment a little more, specifically about if there are similar examples. It made me recall the story of the damn on the Yellowstone River, which may not be the perfect parallel with all the complexity of the Crazies but could work for a bigger picture analogy. As the effort...