brocksw
Well-known member
You’re kidding right? Your graphic shows the same prevalence that area in Wisconsin had over 12 years ago. See the graphic I shared above.No they do not. CWD infection rates have tripled in the past three years.
It took Illinois 10-12 years longer to get to that same prevalence rate by comparison. How does that not prove my point and confirm exactly what the study I shared above states. That the different management strategies have significantly altered disease progression.
It took Wisconsin 10 years to reach 5%+ prevalence rates in that study area. It took Illinois, essentially 20 years in the graphs you share, with significantly less geographic spread. To argue this doesn’t prove my point and the results of that study is either a complete misunderstanding of the concepts or completely disingenuous.