Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That would be an awfully interesting read.View attachment 325298
My great, great, great grandfather, Major James T. Poe, 11th Arkansas Regiment, CSA. Confederate POW at Johnson’s Island, Ohio.
I have a copy of his Civil War diary. Interesting reading. Buried in Long Branch Cemetery, Carbon County, Texas.
Happy hunting, TheGrayRider a/k/a Tom.
Back then soldiers actually aimed their rifles, and knew how to shoot. They were hunters and rifleman.
You think it has anything to do with firing lines at x amount of feet back in the day? as well as well as how far field medics have come? I'm just spit balling.I'm no Civil War expert, but I believe artillery, not muskets, accounted for the largest share of casualties. But I could be misremembering that. Either way, even in the Bronze and early Iron Ages there were battles that resulted in huge mass graves what must have been huge proportions of the total number of combatants. I don't mean to make light of modern wars, and the Ruskies and Ukrains are certainly amassing high body counts, but comparing the numbers of dead to the numbers of combatants and just the size of the regional populations, certainly makes me pause and wonder... Muskets, swords, clubs, and axes in comparison to full autos and the longest range artillery. Maybe it says more about how much more we value lives than did humans of yore.
I mentioned medical in my first post, so yes on that. As for distance? I don't know. Maybe, maybe not. Were they that much shorter ranges relative to the range of their weaponry? Making an apples to apples comparison is probably an issue.You think it has anything to do with firing lines at x amount of feet back in the day? as well as well as how far field medics have come? I'm just spit balling.
Missed that in the first post. I would imagine having one in the pipe while standing lined up in the wide open I'd me damn sure making it count vs having 30 in the mag. Hard to make it a fair comparison. Not a situation you or I could probably fully grasp anyhow.I mentioned medical in my first post, so yes on that. As for distance? I don't know. Maybe, maybe not. Were they that much shorter ranges relative to the range of their weaponry? Making an apples to apples comparison is probably an issue.
That terrain and the vision of the attack in the open in the face of relentless fire made me shudder during a visit there. It was a tragic loss of human life. US citizens killing US citizens, both sides.No image of Gettysburg is complete without a look from Cemetery Ridge to the timber across the open field and try to imagine Confederate troops charging across that open field into the lines and guns of the Union Army….
View attachment 325341
Killer Angels is fine, but it is ultimately fiction. Harry Pfanz's nonfiction Gettysburg trilogy is even more compelling and firmly based in academic research:I’m a government man and went trough my agency’s “leadership institute.” I spent a couple days on Civil War battlefields with a world-renowned Civil War historian and author. Gettysburg and Antietam were both days that have and will influence the rest of my life.
To the OP, strongly encourage reading Killer Angels. It’s a fairly easy read and will make Gettysburg come alive.
I’ve always found the idea that the WW2 Generation was “The Greatest Generation” to be a bit insulting - the Northern Civil War Generation earned that title far more in every conceivable way.
This thread is about the battle of Gettysburg, and, by extension, the Civil War. It's not about the Revolution, hence the reason for centering my response to the Civil War. Certainly the case could be made for the Revolution, however, the Revolutionary War was our choice, and we certainly could have stayed in the British Empire and eventually gotten our independence without the bloodshed. The Civil War was an entirely different animal, and the death and destruction in the Civil War far outstripped that of the Revolution.I don't know if I would agree with that. You could make the same case for the turn of the 19th century folks, the Revolutionary war generation, the European colonists generations, etc. It's the kind of title that probably says more about the bestower than the bestowed.
I don't know if I would agree with that. You could make the same case for the turn of the 19th century folks, the Revolutionary war generation, the European colonists generations, etc. It's the kind of title that probably says more about the bestower than the bestowed.