Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree. I was pleasantly surprised by Quist's perspectives on a number of subjects. His reasoning and thought process shows that he is open to learn, doesn't view himself as having all the answers, willing to ask questions and entertain other's perspectives and experiences. I was impressed.
Quist has to win or the future for our public lands and the hunting heritage I've enjoyed for over 50 years will be but a memory, much sooner than l ever envisioned. But don't worry about GG, he will never have a problem finding a place to recreate and hunt and fish, your children and grandchildren might however.
You make a good point with that question. However, consider that if Gianforte and Daines step up as our congressional delegates, support vocally in DC and vote the national party platform, then Utah and Montana, key federal public lands states, will have made a huge statement on behalf of PLT. I think you have to consider that a likely scenario if Gianforte is elected.The ONLY thing that will save public lands is Montana's single house seat?
It is this kind of hyperbole that makes one question the wisdom of some voters. The ONLY thing that will save public lands is Montana's single house seat? That should get a Forest Gump response. A Quist defeat and the land transfer begins, I guess. If that were true then you already lost.
Nemont
It is this kind of hyperbole that makes one question the wisdom of some voters. The ONLY thing that will save public lands is Montana's single house seat? That should get a Forest Gump response. A Quist defeat and the land transfer begins, I guess. If that were true then you already lost.
Nemont
That's all I was trying to say. I'm pretty sure both Daines and Gianforte would follow the party line and support PLT, thus bringing with them the "back east" politicians who presently have no real stance on the issue.I would suggest that some "back east" politicians without strong leanings would defer to their Montana brethren on this issue ...
Let's read some tea leaves here: in the most recent election in Nov. Zinke carried the day over his Democrat rival and it wasn't close. Trump carried the State by double digits, We know a couple of things: A. John Tester breathed a huge sigh of relief and was more than happy to vote for Zinke's confirmation, 2. Gianforte nearly unseated an incumbent Governor. So moving into the next phase in a state like Montana with Gianforte who has a machine built already, he has the list of name, donors etc, etc. Rob Quist is a political novice who is a very popular entertainer but will rely on the party for support and financing. Given the recent past election I am curious what people believe has changed?
You aren't rational. If you truly believe this then you have already lost. Like I said I like Rob Quist but if he loses, my world doesn't collapse. I didn't like Trump either and I really dislike Hillary but Wednesday November 9th the sun still came up.
Vote as wish just don't ascribe more power to a single politician then they are capable of delivering on. If PLT were going to happen Rob Quist wouldn't have the horse power to stop it.
I think the Democrats are hoping to ride the wave of buyers remorse and disgust that the chit show of a Trump Presidency has brought on so far and associate that with the R party.
They'll be hoping for a while, I haven't heard or read anything of substance that says the general voting population is remorseful at all...
I will be curious how they react to an actual title of a frickin bill at the congress.gov website - H.R.1275 - World's Greatest Healthcare Plan of 2017
This is not a joke and it is not April 1st.