Dec 3, 2015 #1 ERSS Well-known member Joined Jan 23, 2008 Messages 1,501 Location Eastern Idaho Checked some cameras a few weeks ago and found this shot. Best looking bull I have seen or got a pic of in this area. Pretty hard to get a solid number, given the photo quality, but what do you guys think? Attachments phpABUt7pAM.jpg 43.8 KB · Views: 850
Checked some cameras a few weeks ago and found this shot. Best looking bull I have seen or got a pic of in this area. Pretty hard to get a solid number, given the photo quality, but what do you guys think?
Dec 3, 2015 #2 Speeddmn Active member Joined Aug 1, 2013 Messages 586 Location Helena, MT/ Opheim, MT 190-200 lbs of meat is what id score him!
Dec 3, 2015 #4 The Hedgehog Well-known member Joined Dec 19, 2000 Messages 12,176 Location BEST town on EARTH 315
Dec 3, 2015 #5 H hank4elk Well-known member Joined Jan 8, 2015 Messages 9,196 Location SW NM 320 if it's got any mass.
Dec 3, 2015 #6 noharleyyet Well-known member Joined Nov 15, 2004 Messages 43,681 Location TEXAS Agree with GH & hank4.....plenty enough
Dec 3, 2015 #7 Oak Expert Joined Dec 23, 2000 Messages 16,068 Location Colorado Was thinking 310. Could be low.
Dec 3, 2015 #8 ERSS Well-known member Joined Jan 23, 2008 Messages 1,501 Location Eastern Idaho I was thinking a 320-330 range, but with the weak 3rds...? Probably lower. I wouldn't think twice about pulling the trigger, just trying to improve my "on the hoof" scoring
I was thinking a 320-330 range, but with the weak 3rds...? Probably lower. I wouldn't think twice about pulling the trigger, just trying to improve my "on the hoof" scoring
Dec 3, 2015 #9 mtmander Active member Joined Apr 29, 2014 Messages 846 Location Philipsburg, MT or NC can't tell mass , as above weak 3rd , so 300-310
Dec 3, 2015 #10 P phutch30 Well-known member Joined Dec 3, 2008 Messages 692 Location SW MT 315-320 depending on the blur
Dec 3, 2015 #11 Dinkshooter Well-known member Joined Oct 5, 2005 Messages 7,969 Location Colorado 270-340
Dec 3, 2015 #12 ERSS Well-known member Joined Jan 23, 2008 Messages 1,501 Location Eastern Idaho Dinkshooter said: 270-340 Click to expand... Nailed it !!
Dec 3, 2015 #14 P phutch30 Well-known member Joined Dec 3, 2008 Messages 692 Location SW MT I think my wag of 315-320 is too high. I tried adding up the score but cant see the g2s and took a wag on width at 33-35. Im in the 300-310 guess now 1-16-17 2-14-15 3-10ish 4-17ish 5-10ish 35 spread 45" beams 23" mass
I think my wag of 315-320 is too high. I tried adding up the score but cant see the g2s and took a wag on width at 33-35. Im in the 300-310 guess now 1-16-17 2-14-15 3-10ish 4-17ish 5-10ish 35 spread 45" beams 23" mass
Dec 11, 2015 #16 D danr55 Well-known member Joined Dec 18, 2000 Messages 4,385 Location Mesa, AZ 300 to 320.. I think Greenhorn hit this one right on.. 315.
Dec 11, 2015 #17 TimeOnTarget Well-known member Joined Feb 13, 2015 Messages 1,359 Location SD Big enough!