Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes. 18 inch pounds is adequate to hold it in place as long as your rings are machined properly and provide enough surface area contact with the scope tube.But if the scope slides in the rings and gets damaged because I don't torque it to the rings' spec, should Vortex have to replace that?
I'd go with what the scope manufacturer suggests. If you exceed that and crush the tube it'll be obvious you over torqued it. They may still warranty it but they shouldn't have to.
As much as I hate to admit it, I know from experience that Vortex will still warranty the scope if it is over torqued.I'd go with what the scope manufacturer suggests. If you exceed that and crush the tube it'll be obvious you over torqued it. They may still warranty it but they shouldn't have to.
Hopefully he'll avoid that process.As much as I hate to admit it, I know from experience that Vortex will still warranty the scope if it is over torqued.
I went with no loctite and 20 inch pounds. We'll see how that works
From the DNZ websiteWhy wouldn’t you use loctite?
I always degrease and add a drop of blue.
From the DNZ website
"Thread Locker – it is not needed with our mounts if it is installed correct. DO NOT use any type of thread locker on our long ring screws. The screws we use are longer than other companies screws. We have about 20 threads holding your scope in place on each screw. If you do use thread locker, most of the time you will have to saw or break screws to get your scope out of mount. Do not send any mount back to us for exchange or refund if it has thread locker on the mount at any spot"
I've never done it that I can recall, but does anyone use a torch in that situation? Also there is a product called hard as nails used to repair broken/damaged fingernails that serves the same purpose. I never use anything on the screws unless they come that way.