Time for hunters to make a stand

Awesome that you and your family can laugh at the marchers and their signs.

You should all be proud of yourselves.

View attachment 67200

Give me a break. No one on this thread is talking about this little girl and you know it. Dressing up like female genitalia or comparing the treatment of women to the the 2nd Amendment warrants a bit of spirited debate.
 
Give me a break. No one on this thread is talking about this little girl and you know it. Dressing up like female genitalia or comparing the treatment of women to the the 2nd Amendment warrants a bit of spirited debate.


Jm77 said his wife and daughters were laughing at the marchers and their signs. He said they were mocking that little girl.

3 million women in places like Boise, and Helena, and Stanley, and...... The list goes on and on we're able to go out, make themselves known, and, apparently by using words the president likes to use and wearing pink hats, they were able to kickstart a movement and, make people like JM77 extremely uncomfortable, to the point of having to mock the participants.
 

Jm77 said his wife and daughters were laughing at the marchers and their signs. He said they were mocking that little girl.

3 million women in places like Boise, and Helena, and Stanley, and...... The list goes on and on we're able to go out, make themselves known, and, apparently by using words the president likes to use and wearing pink hats, they were able to kickstart a movement and, make people like JM77 extremely uncomfortable, to the point of having to mock the participants.

No, he never mocked that particular girl. Troll somewhere else or provide concrete examples of executive orders or legislation from his first week in office that hurt women. I'm with you if he has or does in the future.
 
Jm77 said his wife and daughters were laughing at the marchers and their signs. He said they were mocking that little girl.

3 million women in places like Boise, and Helena, and Stanley, and...... The list goes on and on we're able to go out, make themselves known, and, apparently by using words the president likes to use and wearing pink hats, they were able to kickstart a movement and, make people like JM77 extremely uncomfortable, to the point of having to mock the participants.

There is a way to describe someone like you, but I won't do it. There are many things I don't care for in this world; one of the worst being someone who disagrees with me and then puts words in my mouth. Nice try...

You go ahead and tout this movement, your choice. I am fully aware of what my family was laughing at and you can try to twist that around any way you want to look like the presence you think you have on here. Carry on with your garbage Cuervo, it's what you do best.
 
There is a way to describe someone like you, but I won't do it. There are many things I don't care for in this world; one of the worst being someone who disagrees with me and then puts words in my mouth. Nice try...

You go ahead and tout this movement, your choice. I am fully aware of what my family was laughing at and you can try to twist that around any way you want to look like the presence you think you have on here. Carry on with your garbage Cuervo, it's what you do best.

Well said Jeff!!!
 
"I have three grownup daughters and a wife who didn't march. I kept out of it, but the conversation between those three and my wife was wildly amusing at Sunday dinner, *laughing at all the characters with their signs*." [Emphasis added]

You used the word "all". The little girl Jose posted is one of those characters that your spoor was laughing at. Either learn how to write or stand corrected.
 
No, he never mocked that particular girl. Troll somewhere else or provide concrete examples of executive orders or legislation from his first week in office that hurt women. I'm with you if he has or does in the future.

Mexico City rule sound familiar?
Repealing Obamacare exec order?

Didn't take him long.

But even better, 3 million women saw enough, they didn't need to wait. They were able to decide when they watched Betsy DaVos hearings, Scott Pruitt issues, Tom Price hearings, Jeff Sessions hearings.

You don't have to wait when you see who he appointed and who has his ear.

And, Trump clearly said that "size matters" and crowds are the best indicator for him.
 
Awesome that you and your family can laugh at the marchers and their signs.

You should all be proud of yourselves.

View attachment 67200

Jose, if you are as passionate about affecting positive change as you claim to be, you would realize that this type of caricature of someone who disagrees with you on a particular issue ensures their opposition to whatever you promote in the future. I get the sense that for you it's not about bringing about good policy as you claim, but you get some type of personal satisfaction from thinking you are superior to those who disagree with you. Enjoy it now because it only alienates anyone who attempts to be objective about what constitutes serious issues.

As far as the Mexico City rule and repealing Obama Care... that sounds like progress to me. Why were our tax dollars funding abortions in foreign countries to begin with? Remodeling an unsustainable health care system sounds a lot more like sane policy than forcing the disaster that is the AFA down America's throat like the Dems did under President Obama.
 
,
Go ask your wife, or your daughter.

Or one of the 3+ million who marched 24 hours after his inauguration, as they seemed to have figured it out in a timely manner.


My wife and older daughters 15/17 thought most of those women looked ridiculous. Furthermore they have enough knowledge of american government to realize that no one man including the president can effect a persons individual rights.
 
You used the word "all". The little girl Jose posted is one of those characters that your spoor was laughing at. Either learn how to write or stand corrected.[/QUOTE]

From what I see on here Riley, you are the one who needs correcting not me. Obviously, you don't know the difference between literally and figuratively.

And your choice of words could be a big inconvenience to you someday. Especially if you use them in the presence of a human and not a screen. Of course, that would not be my style. I would simply forgive you.
 
Obviously, you don't know the difference between literally and figuratively.

Then extend that same latitude to others. I'm willing to consider Trump's statement about the press as hyperbole, eliciting laughs at the CIA. It pissed me off when the press holds him to a literal interpretation of that statement. But then again, when Jose comes back with a picture of some little girl and you go all moon-walking and get indignant about it, you are doing the same damn thing. I called you on it. Don't go using figurative shit if you won't allow a rhetorical response to it. See how that works?
 
"spoor" - "The track or scent of an animal".... I think you meant to use the word "spawn". Obviously that description of JM77's family members is more accurate since the women in his family chose not to participate in the women's march. My guess is that JM77 forced them to stay home and make him sammiches since they are too weak minded to think for themselves.


I wonder if we'll hear the first amendment expressions that take place during the March for Life on this Friday celebrated like the viewpoints expressed during the Women's March? Although those marchers are notoriously bigoted and intolerant, believing that every human life is valuable and all that...
 
As far as the Mexico City rule and repealing Obama Care...

You are missing the point. A question was asked about the purpose of the marches (earlier) and how women have been affected (more recently). It matters naught whether the women were right or not; the answer to the question was provided. Millions of women marched, and perceive their interests to have been affected because of the reasons stated. They may be right or wrong, and you may agree with them or disagree with them, but nevertheless, there was a reason for the marches and rights were perceived to have been affected. How you feel about the merits of their case, and how they feel about it is, for the purposes of this discussion, irrelevant.

As to alternative and more effective methods of changing minds, I agree with you. However, when people insist on chasing rabbits, it won't necessarily get them back on track by pointing out their errors in reasoning. Rather, you end up being marginalized as an "elitist."

So, "in your face" doesn't work. Neither does reason. That's because you can't fix stupid. The alternative is to stand down, cede the floor and let stupid rule the day in the hopes that they might eventually rue it. The latter is not an option when you and yours end up paying the price too.

Sometimes John Brown is right to push things off the fence. I don't want to see it but damn, the fact we are headed that direction has nothing to do with the left, and a perceived failure to properly educate those who have to learn the hard way.

If you have a better way of teaching, I just thought I'd point out that apparently it's not working. People are still voting for the party of PLT.
 
Then extend that same latitude to others. I'm willing to consider Trump's statement about the press as hyperbole, eliciting laughs at the CIA. It pissed me off when the press holds him to a literal interpretation of that statement. But then again, when Jose comes back with a picture of some little girl and you go all moon-walking and get indignant about it, you are doing the same damn thing. I called you on it. Don't go using figurative shit if you won't allow a rhetorical response to it. See how that works?
Duck and dodge, nice try...
 
Back
Top