Addicting
Well-known member
I wonder, if I shoot the woodchuck eating all my beans and it dies on the neighbors property, would I care? Better put it on YouTube so everyone can tell me their options.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So if he shot the bull a mile from the boundary and the same scenario played would you be okay with it? While I agree there was no need to shoot something that close to the boundary without having confirmed permissions what has your thread and YouTube accomplished besides making you both look bad
Thanks @devon deer for tagging me in,
I spend a lot of time travelling too and from the continent (Germany) to learn and work my dog, I also travel many many miles here on the UK to help other hunters if required.
I am one of only a handful of dog handlers with a qualified tracking dog (European recognised tracking tests)in England we have a big problem with boundary’s, you are on a track and you have blood for hair at the fence and without permission legally I can not cross. Last year 3 tracks all over 3km and I had to stop.
Now I don’t know how things go on the US, but if a beast crosses a fence wounded the first thing I would do is find the land owner and at least notify them of the situation, you never know you luck they might give you permission to continue your search.
The pictures below are from a young red stag shot close to a boundary fence, the hunter went for a neck shot and the bullet hit the throat, the animal ran with the herd almost 2km we tracked the next morning, once shot the animal crossed and the hunter gained permission for us to cross and start the search, one of the very few times this has happened!
In my opinion you don’t shoot 2 animals if you can’t find the first.