D
Deleted member 28227
Guest
Montana data is just FUBAR... it's either just wildly inaccurate or prohibitively expensive.it's gov't math. It's not supposed to make sense.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Montana data is just FUBAR... it's either just wildly inaccurate or prohibitively expensive.it's gov't math. It's not supposed to make sense.
Montana data is just FUBAR... it's either just wildly inaccurate or prohibitively expensive.
“Tis yearssss, hunters came out in record apply for zzee permits and purchases license in April 1... wooo jokes... I like the one with the water in the buck. More than 82,384 residents, great peoples... aways have the best beer and 16,650 nonresidents f-you you dirty people in Minnesota or Baker... that's not even Montana, is west Dakota... oh yeah, apps permits. That’s a 12.48 percent and 29.52 percent *woah* increase over last year, perspectively.”What do you expect? They are simultaneously being overrun with vermin Elk, while wolves, bears & lions are eating everything and there are none left for hunters.
Could be in contention for post of the year so far...“Tis yearssss, hunters came out in record apply for zzee permits and purchases license in April 1... wooo jokes... I like the one with the water in the buck. More than 82,384 residents, great peoples... aways have the best beer and 16,650 nonresidents f-you you dirty people in Minnesota or Baker... that's not even Montana, is west Dakota... oh yeah, apps permits. That’s a 12.48 percent and 29.52 percent *woah* increase over last year, perspectively.”
ah...got it... makes more sense now.
I pay almost zero attention to MT, so this number was shockingly low to me.
For the two items/issues I bolded, I agree that each of those would be good things. However, I feel those will become more the norm and expansion of each of those programs in states with point scheme's will happen. Each are a good 'business' decision for the F&G departments. Keeps more interest in their product and sells more hunting licenses. I do not see a reason why a state wouldn't implement them.To answer your question directly, I am one of those people who will stay in the points game.
As far as predictions go, I do believe applications will level out soon. After this year and perhaps next, much of the effects of stimulus payments should level out. Without getting political, or attempting to predict some kind of recession, I will say I expect taxes to change a bit and the average household's disposable income to shrink back towards pre-pandemic levels.
As many know, only a percentage of the country is actually "worse off" now than before; many have seen their savings, portfolios etc. increase over the last year. A lot of that is... less than permanent, IMO.
That said, most of the interest in western hunting will remain. I expect something like a return to mean, but to a mean that is still high. It should be a several year cycle before the next "new" trend takes over. We had the North American Whitetail/Bone Collector era of hunting media, the shorter Duck Commander era, and now the Western big game era. I am scared Alaska is next...
One thing that will affect the trend is the drop off in higher point-holders that will start in the 2030s. I don’t look forward to it or expect it to do much for draw odds, but there may be a touch of reverse point creep as older dudes age out of some of the more challenging western hunts. There will be bigger problems to solve then that overshadow any improvement in draw odds, I think.
I hope to see more states requiring tag expenses up front (knowing this would hurt my ability to apply for more states). If you can pay for the tag in June when you draw, you can pay for it in April when you apply, or at least that's my opinion.
Would also like to see more hunts that "cost" you your points, as in you can't build points AND hunt the same state the same year. I'm not 100 percent on this one though, as it might make odds better on low point hunts but much worse on the higher end.
Either way, as long as I physically can, I will do my research and try to secure hunting opportunities at home and all across this awesome country. What is that quote? Never tell me the odds
Not really, when you're applying for multiple tags for multiple people(wife/kids) with low percentages(<0.1% to 4%), you can only expect to draw one or two, if that, from a couple of dozen applications. That is 20-30k on the line when you only need 1-5k for tags.I hope to see more states requiring tag expenses up front (knowing this would hurt my ability to apply for more states). If you can pay for the tag in June when you draw, you can pay for it in April when you apply, or at least that's my opinion.
Ya I was going to post the same thing. We must allow crossguns in archery seasons now in order to recruit more hunters. Has nothing to do with corrupt legislators taking money from Ravin."But we need to recruit more hunters."
How dare you say Baker is western North Dakota. You will smoke a turd in hell for that one“Tis yearssss, hunters came out in record apply for zzee permits and purchases license in April 1... wooo jokes... I like the one with the water in the buck. More than 82,384 residents, great peoples... aways have the best beer and 16,650 nonresidents f-you you dirty people in Minnesota or Baker... that's not even Montana, is west Dakota... oh yeah, apps permits. That’s a 12.48 percent and 29.52 percent *woah* increase over last year, perspectively.”
ah...got it... makes more sense now.
It's also interesting to look at actual number of tags given out, versus actual number of hunters in the field.I find the draw demand issue very complex and that it doesn't lend itself to simple / obvious linear trends...