Endangering Yellowstone's Grizzlies
The recovery of the grizzly bear population in the greater Yellowstone region is a triumph of human restraint. Thirty years ago, after a long period of mismanagement, the bears were listed as a threatened species. Now, their numbers have risen from perhaps as few as 200 to perhaps as many as 600. That has led the Interior Department to consider removing them from the endangered species list - a proposal that has split the conservation world. The National Wildlife Federation, for instance, believes that the original goals of protecting the bears have been met. But other groups - including the Natural Resources Defense Council - believe the bears should still be protected. We agree.
If grizzlies are removed from the endangered species list, they will come under the protection of a management plan developed by the three states that surround Yellowstone. Given those states' historic hostility to large predators, the fact that the plan calls for a resumption of hunting is worrisome. But much more important is the danger that it might open up a good deal of the grizzlies' already-diminished range to commercial exploitation.
The fate of the grizzlies should remind us all how effective the Endangered Species Act really is and why it is worth safeguarding it from legislative assault. But it should also remind us that there is still no effective legal protection for animals that have recovered in numbers but are still threatened by the pressure of human activity.
The recovery of the grizzly bear population in the greater Yellowstone region is a triumph of human restraint. Thirty years ago, after a long period of mismanagement, the bears were listed as a threatened species. Now, their numbers have risen from perhaps as few as 200 to perhaps as many as 600. That has led the Interior Department to consider removing them from the endangered species list - a proposal that has split the conservation world. The National Wildlife Federation, for instance, believes that the original goals of protecting the bears have been met. But other groups - including the Natural Resources Defense Council - believe the bears should still be protected. We agree.
If grizzlies are removed from the endangered species list, they will come under the protection of a management plan developed by the three states that surround Yellowstone. Given those states' historic hostility to large predators, the fact that the plan calls for a resumption of hunting is worrisome. But much more important is the danger that it might open up a good deal of the grizzlies' already-diminished range to commercial exploitation.
The fate of the grizzlies should remind us all how effective the Endangered Species Act really is and why it is worth safeguarding it from legislative assault. But it should also remind us that there is still no effective legal protection for animals that have recovered in numbers but are still threatened by the pressure of human activity.
