The best of sheriff Mike Cook

Michaelr

New member
Joined
Apr 2, 2002
Messages
1,005
Location
idaho
You just gotta love sheriff Mike
hump.gif
hump.gif


It's For The Children
By Sheriff Mike Cook

It seems that all we hear about these days is taxes and budgets and how the Cities, Counties, and the State can't seem to balance them or how they need more money to keep the service level at what the citizens have come to expect. Well, as always I have something to say about all this. For you weak at heart liberals, you may not want to read on because I don't want to offend your sensibilities as this is going to get right down to it.
There are three things the government can do to help cut our taxes to a level we can all live with. The first is to stop duplication of services. This is a big one and needs to be addressed. The second one is to repeal all the laws on the books that protect us from ourselves. The third thing is to stop government from giving special interest group agendas protection and special privileges.

Now you are saying, what is he talking about? Well, I'm talking about all the laws on the books like the mandatory seat belt laws and the mandatory helmet laws just to list a couple. Now they are talking about regulating the ATV (All Terrain Vehicles) vehicle usage more because of all the accidents and fatalities with the off road vehicles.

I'm sick and tired of our elected officials attempting to tell us how to live and looking down on us, thinking they know what's best for us. Pay attention all you liberals. Government needs to get off that throne they believe they are on, do the people's business and forget all this other junk.

They pass these laws to protect the stupid and this is interfering with natural selection. You see people who drive or ride in cars without seatbelts, or ride motorcycles without helmet's are not very intelligent people to began with. So they most likely will pay the price for that, and society is better off because they won't reproduce and cause more stupid people in society. This is a harsh statement but it is part of natural selection.

The sad thing is that once these laws are on the books they are not cost effective. We then put more burden on our law enforcement officers to enforce these dumb laws, instead of focusing their attention on the bad crimes we need them to work on. They even have a fund here in Oregon that gives extra money to local law enforcement for officers to work overtime to enforce seat belt laws. They call these "grants". The truth is that these are tax money that is being spent because someone got a dumb law passed, most likely the insurance companies.

Oh yes, the insurance companies love these laws. Instead of inserting a clause in the contract you sign that they don't have to pay if you are not wearing your seat belt, they get a law passed to attempt to make everyone wear the belt, because the masses are too dumb to do it on their own.

It's no different than the anti-gun movement's agenda to try to take all our firearms. They want to protect us from ourselves by taking these "instruments of destruction" from us. This is how stupid these people get and it is killing our society and freedoms. They don't understand that firearms are used thousands more times to protect the users from crimes than they are used to commit crimes or self inflicted injuries. That's right, they do good things for society and are not a scourge at all.

The long and short of it is, people have been doing things from the beginning of time that were dangerous or dumb. Sometimes they are killed or injured in the process. This is the natural way of things. We don't need big brother hanging around keeping us safe by passing these laws to protect us from ourselves.

Government needs to get on with the business of using our tax dollars for the best needs of the people and providing services we need like public safety and for our military. It would save them and us money and while they are at it we need to get rid of all these social services as well. This can be provided by the private sector.

You see it's all a matter of trust. We don't trust the government and they don't trust us to do the right thing. So they keep passing laws for us that will protect us from ourselves. How dumb can it get? Well you watch. We are about to get a bunch of our elected officials time wasted, not to mention tax money, on passing law to regulate ATV's so that people who take them out and have fun with them will be more safe. Remember it's for the children.

God Bless America,
God Bless our Troops still in Harms Way.

Michael E. Cook, Coos County Sheriff, Retired.

<FONT COLOR="#800080" SIZE="1">[ 09-08-2003 00:16: Message edited by: michaelr ]</font>
 
I guess some people feel so inept in life that passing all those extra law's to protect us from ourselfs make's them feel safer
wink.gif

Gotta love Sheriff Mike.
 
MD,

You probably missed it, maybe it was during your hiatus, but we pretty much all came to the conclusion that anyone who agreed with Sheriff Mike was as big a whack job as he is.

Just thought I would pass it along, as I am sure you didn't want to be viewed as a Sheriff Mike whack-o.
shhh.gif
 
How could anyone "not" agree with what was said in the obove post credited to this sherriff Mike dude? i would like to hear someone challenge the content.
 
CJ,

His rants are always 1/2 looney, and I am not even sure what this one is about....

He seems to have 3 ideas about balancing the state budgets, in his first paragraph, and then never gets back around to two of them.
rolleyes.gif


And then he goes off on laws to protect stupid people from doing stupid things. This is his attempt at solving all the budget deficits across the country. But, curiously, his content does not have a single fact or number in it, to prove his point.

CJ, how many city budgets would be balanced if the seat belt laws were removed from the books? How many state budgets would be balanced if ATV regulations were removed?

The guy is a looney-tune, and you can't argue with the content of his rant, as there is no content.
eek.gif
 
i am not here to defend this guy , but what he has said makes sense, paying cops extra money to enforce seatbelt laws is bullshit! ,and if they stopped that wouldn`t that save money? A BIG YES! you know that is a fact, right? i don`t care where the money comes from, grants, or whatever it`s still money being spent poorly if not entirely a waste, now if you can`t understand that, but i know that you do,this guy might be a crackpot but even if a crackpot gets its it right i have to agree.
 
CJ,

I am not sure what the seat belt laws in AZ are like, but until this past July, the law in Idaho was a "Secondary Violation", in that the cops would not pull one over for the seat belt, but if they pulled you over for something else, they would write the extra ticket. It cost nothing, and raised a bit of $$$ and some awareness. Awareness is a good thing, as generally only stupid people don't wear seat belts, so they need to be made aware.
wink.gif


Now, in Idaho, the law changed (by legislation passed by the Republican DOMINATED legislature, in that Seat Belts can be a Primary Violation. Cops will now be able to pull you over for not wearing a seatbelt.

(And to help you support these types of laws, just think, the AZ cops can now pull over every tub thumpin', hydraulic poppin', low-ridin' 78 Monte Carlo they see.... Just to check for Seat Belts.... and maybe green cards...)
wink.gif
shhh.gif


And if they stopped enforcing seat belt laws, I doubt a single municipal budget would be balanced. If you want to save your tax $$$$, give McCain a call, and ask him to get moving on getting those dams on the Lower Snake River breached. That will save us far more money, and allow us to fund more Border Patrol agents for AZ.
cool.gif



****************************
And more on Seat Belt Laws, from the NHSTA..

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR> National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Undated

The Benefits of State Seat Belt Laws
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
States with secondary enforcement average only 63 percent belt use. But states with primary (standard) enforcement belt laws average 78 percent belt use.
Most everyone would agree that protecting lives with seat belts is at least as important as a broken tail light or littering. Yet, while virtually every state has standard laws that allow enforcement officers to stop and ticket a violator for having a broken tail light or for tossing trash out the window, most states currently do not have standard laws for seat belt use.

Increasing the national seat belt use rate to 90 percent from the current 68 percent would prevent and estimated 5,536 fatalities, 132,670 injuries and save the nation $8.8 billion annually.

We all pay for those who do not wear seat belts. The higher health care and insurance costs that result from unbelted drivers and passengers involved in crashes get passed along to everyone. For example, the costs of hospital care for an unbelted driver are 50 percent higher than those for a driver who was wearing a safety belt. Society bears 85 percent of those costs, not the individuals involved.

Some people see the choice to wear seat belts as a matter of “personal freedom.” But in our society, personal freedoms stop where others are injured or killed. This is especially true when it comes to children’s safety as passengers in a motor vehicle. A child unrestrained in a 30-mile-per-hour crash is like a child dropped from a third story window. Yet adults who do not buckle up are sending a message to our children it is all right not to use seat belts. Research shows that when a driver is unbuckled, 70 percent of the time children in that vehicle will not be buckled either.

When asked whether they support primary enforcement laws – laws that give law enforcement the authority to stop and ticket an unbuckled occupant, just as they do other routine violations of the law like littering or driving with a broken tail light – the public overwhelming supports primary seat belt laws, 61 to 35 percent. (Source: Public Opinion Strategies, July 1997)

When the public learns that a majority of the time when the driver is unbuckled, passengers in that vehicle – including children – are unbuckled, 70 percent support the statement that “It should be completely unacceptable for anyone to ride unbuckled in America.” (Source: Public Opinion Strategies, July 1997)
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

<FONT COLOR="#800080" SIZE="1">[ 09-10-2003 22:24: Message edited by: ElkGunner ]</font>
 
MD,

"You probably missed it, maybe it was during your hiatus, but we pretty much all came to the conclusion that anyone who agreed with Sheriff Mike was as big a whack job as he is.

Just thought I would pass it along, as I am sure you didn't want to be viewed as a Sheriff Mike whack-o. "


Oh Elkgunner,thanks for keeping me in the know LOL
But being called a wack job by people that support scumb bag's like Jon Marvel and other far out greenie group's isnt much of a slam in my book.
I have been called worse,and I still stand by what I feel is right.

Beside's being labled a wack-o is lower down on the slam scale then being a limp wristed greenie ( at least in my circle of friend's it is.)

wink.gif
wink.gif
 
Though some of what the good sheriff may have said, may have been a little scattered, there are many valid points that were brought up, and I have never seen any thing that came to a major conclusion on this board that said we "ALL" disagree with what he said, only some of you that don't see any thing past the communist/socialist agenda agreed whole heartedly on this communal agreement!!!
rolleyes.gif
rolleyes.gif
rolleyes.gif
 
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR> For you weak at heart liberals, you may not want to read on because I don't want to offend your sensibilities <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

We "whack-O s" rest our case agin the "limp wristed greenies"!
tongue.gif
tongue.gif
tongue.gif


biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif
 
PEAX Trekking Poles

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
113,581
Messages
2,025,879
Members
36,237
Latest member
SCOOTER848
Back
Top