Hunt Talk Radio - Look for it on your favorite Podcast platform

Surprise, surprise, if you Get Rid of the Cattle on a Wildlife Refuge, Game THRIVES!!

JoseCuervo

New member
Joined
Feb 26, 2003
Messages
9,752
Location
South of the Border
Recent wildlife surveys show that populations of pronghorn antelope, California bighorn sheep and sage grouse are all on the rise at Hart Mountain National Antelope Refuge in Lake County.

"Sage grouse numbers are way up, pronghorn numbers are up, and that's important because they're a couple of the indicator species we manage for," Hart Mountain wildlife manager Mike Nunn said. "The whole habitat at Hart Mountain is better."

This year marks the 10th anniversary of a management plan that bans livestock grazing from the refuge for 15 years.

The plan reversed a decades-long policy that permitted thousands of cattle to graze during the summer months.

A determination on whether or not to again allow grazing will be made in 2009 or whenever the plan is updated.

Nunn thinks that the removal of livestock is a major contributor to the increased wildlife populations. He also said that the removal of fences that hinder pronghorn movement, a stepped-up fire management program, the ending of a drought and other factors have contributed to increased wildlife numbers.

When the management plan was implemented, the refuge and much of southeastern Oregon was mired in a drought, which ended after the plan was implemented.

Nunn said he does not expect that large-scale livestock grazing will again be permitted at Hart Mountain.

"I'm sure that's going to be the main topic of discussion in the next planning session," Nunn said. "Even at Hart Mountain there are meadows that would be better if grazed, but it's so small-scale economically I can't see anybody doing that."

Biologists at the refuge are also trying to improve sage grouse habitat, he said.

A bighorn sheep census at the refuge last summer resulted in a population estimate of 353. The numbers are high enough that the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife plans to collect and relocate 20 bighorns to other areas in early December.
 
He also said that the removal of fences that hinder pronghorn movement, a stepped-up fire management program, the ending of a drought and other factors have contributed to increased wildlife numbers.

When the management plan was implemented, the refuge and much of southeastern Oregon was mired in a drought, which ended after the plan was implemented.
...Nunn said. "Even at Hart Mountain there are meadows that would be better if grazed, but it's so small-scale economically I can't see anybody doing that."

EG, are you saying that it was all because of grazing? Did the grazing create the drought??? Did the grazing curtail the fire management plan??? I don't see anything there that says that grazing was the sole cause of any of those problems.

Tha sky is NOT falling today.....
 
The winter of 1994 destroyed deer and antelope herds all over South Eastern Oregon. Deer and especially antelope numbers are up all over SE Oregon for the past few years. I've helped with service projects on Hart Mountain because they are good for wildlife. Hart Mountain NWR is probably a good place to keep livestock off of. But animal rebounds are the norm for the entire region, even with livestock.
 
Ten beers,

Does grazing during a drought help the condition of the range?

Does not having enough fuel to carry a fire because of grazing impede natural fire processes? Does changing fuel types/habitat types because of grazing disrupt fire intervals, intensities, etc.?
 
Removal of grazing is not a panacea. Grazing can be a VERY effective tool in habitat management if used right.

In addition to Buzz's questions, grazing can help deter fire, which can be very important if cheatgrass or other invasive exotics are prevalent in an area.

Grazing is like a hammer, one can do some great things with it, but mis-use can also be a problem. However, I do agree that not all areas are suitable for grazing.
 
"Even at Hart Mountain there are meadows that would be better if grazed, but it's so small-scale economically I can't see anybody doing that."

1Pointer, I agree with you " that not all areas are suitable for grazing."
It's the Jon Marvel/Michael Moore type people that need to read the writing on the wall LOL



By pushing there anti-grazing agenda they do more good for the cause by bring light to the fact that grazing can be good.

Elkgunner,Ithaca and Buzz are as good at getting there message across as Michael Moore and the hollywood crowd did in getting John Kerry elected.
Thank you guys keep up the good work.
 
BUZZ, I was just pointing out that according to the article, removal of grazing wasn't "sole" reason for herd growth. If you don't like the facts, don't post.
 
MTNTOUGH - Use promo code RANDY for 30 days free

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
113,624
Messages
2,027,266
Members
36,253
Latest member
jbuck7th
Back
Top