I can't imagine anyone driving to Montana for the express purpose of shooting sharpies.
,,,that be me,,,
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can't imagine anyone driving to Montana for the express purpose of shooting sharpies.
Agreed. I don't see this bill accomplishing much. Just makes it look like FWP is doing something without actually doing much if anything.What is the problem? If only roosters are shot, increased hunting pressure would not substantially
impact the pheasant population.
If there is increased pressure, huns start flushing at 100 yards and sharptails learn to flush at 200 yards.
With increased pressure, hunting success on public land declines, as birds relocate to areas that are private,
or require sweat-equity.
Seems like the bill addresses a perceived human hunter crowding problem, not a bird population problem.
By allowing non-residents to hunt 28 straight days, would the bill substantially solve a perceived hunting pressure problem?
Why not delay openers for non-residents by 2 weeks?
Why not issue 5-day non-resident bird licenses that are valid only on weekdays?
If the problem is hunting pressure, reduce hunting pressure by resident-only days or weeks.
512 was tabled too.Current Bill Progress: In Second House Committee--Tabled
with vote 19-0
SENATE BILL NO. 512 is also noteworthy:
the commission shall by rule limit the number of nonresident game bird licenses to 10%
of the number of licenses purchased the previous year by residents