Federal judge dismisses challenge
By MATT JOYCE
Associated Press writer
CHEYENNE -- A federal judge on Tuesday threw out environmental challenges against the government's approval of natural gas drilling in the Atlantic Rim area of south-central Wyoming.
U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington, D.C., sided with the Bureau of Land Management, the state of Wyoming and gas producers Anadarko, Warren Resources and Double Eagle Petroleum.
The BLM in 2007 agreed to allow 2,000 new gas and oil wells over about 421 square miles of publicly and privately owned land within Carbon County. The Atlantic Rim is a remote area that's home to thousands of mule deer, pronghorn, elk and sage grouse. The BLM has said the project could produce 1.35 trillion cubic feet of natural gas over 30 to 50 years.
In response to the BLM's decision, the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership accused the government of violating federal land management laws. It said the decision was "arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion" and in violation of the Federal Land Policy Management and National Environmental Policy Act.
The Natural Resources Defense Council, Biodiversity Conservation Alliance, Wyoming Outdoor Council, Western Watersheds Project and Wyoming Wilderness Association followed up with a lawsuit of their own. They also accused the government of violating NEPA.
In a single ruling that applied to both lawsuits, Leon backed up the BLM's decision-making process. He said the agency considered the potential for methane leaks, the impacts on sage grouse and mule deer, and allowed necessary public comment.
Leon said the agency followed federal law and "took the requisite hard look at environmental effects before approving drilling permits."
Steve Belinda, energy initiative manager for the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership, declined to comment on the specifics of Leon's ruling. He said the group wanted to stop the Atlantic Rim from being industrialized.
"A lot of people go there to hunt mule deer, pronghorn and elk," said Belinda, of Boulder. "It was a very popular area that a lot of people locally were disappointed to see being prescribed for industrial use."
Looks like the i's were dotted and the t's crossed...
In another report, I heard that they are proposing some new development methods for this area. Any of the O/G folks (Oak?) no anything about those?