RobG
Well-known member
Hi,
I just got an email from a "strong advocate for increased management of our forests" about how awesome the Resilient Federal Forest Act of 2015 (HR 2647) is and that I should urge my Congressmen to vote yes on it. The bill "Authorizes a categorical exclusion to improve, enhance, or create early successional forests for wildlife habitat improvement."
So I looked at the bill. A few things caught my attention.
Okaaay... so perhaps a better name would be "The Logging Act that will Waive NEPA for Just About any Reason Act." And if you don't like it...
Don't sound that good to me....
And for the curious about beetle kill and fire... https://www.google.com/search?q=does+beetle+kill+increase+fire+risk&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
I just got an email from a "strong advocate for increased management of our forests" about how awesome the Resilient Federal Forest Act of 2015 (HR 2647) is and that I should urge my Congressmen to vote yes on it. The bill "Authorizes a categorical exclusion to improve, enhance, or create early successional forests for wildlife habitat improvement."
So I looked at the bill. A few things caught my attention.
andSEC. 2. Definitions.
In this Act:
(1) CATASTROPHIC EVENT.—The term “catastrophic event” means any natural disaster (such as hurricane, tornado, windstorm, snow or ice storm, rain storm, high water, wind-driven water, tidal wave, earthquake, volcanic eruption, landslide, mudslide, drought, or insect or disease outbreak) or any fire, flood, or explosion, regardless of cause.
(2) CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION.—The term “categorical exclusion” refers to an exception to the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4331 et seq.) for a project or activity relating to the management of National Forest System lands or public lands.
SEC. 102. Categorical exclusion to expedite certain critical response actions.
(a) Availability of categorical exclusion.—A categorical exclusion is available to the Secretary concerned to develop and carry out a forest management activity on National Forest System lands or public lands when the primary purpose of the forest management activity is—
(1) to address an insect or disease infestation;
(2) to reduce hazardous fuel loads;
(3) to protect a municipal water source;
(4) to maintain, enhance, or modify critical habitat to protect it from catastrophic disturbances;
(5) to increase water yield; or
(6) any combination of the purposes specified in paragraphs (1) through (5).
Okaaay... so perhaps a better name would be "The Logging Act that will Waive NEPA for Just About any Reason Act." And if you don't like it...
SEC. 203. Prohibition on restraining orders, preliminary injunctions, and injunctions pending appeal.
No restraining order, preliminary injunction, or injunction pending appeal shall be issued by any court of the United States with respect to any decision to prepare or conduct a salvage operation or reforestation activity in response to a large-scale catastrophic event. Section 705 of title 5, United States Code, shall not apply to any challenge to the salvage operation or reforestation activity.
Don't sound that good to me....
And for the curious about beetle kill and fire... https://www.google.com/search?q=does+beetle+kill+increase+fire+risk&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
Last edited: