cantgetdrawn
New member
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2013
- Messages
- 76
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I doubt the Center of Biological Diversity has the same thought I do in mind... But an expansion of the grizzly population in new areas they listed, as well as population increases in the states they are already in... could we see a delisting and possible hunting seasons in the next 5-10 years?
For the Yellowstone & NCDE populations, we're already headed down that path. Agencies at the state and federal level are getting ready to issue a delisting decision, which is why the efforts of the Inter-agency Grizzly Bear Committee are so important. So are maintaining our approved management plans.
And for the record - If California wants to have a grizz on their flag, they should have them in their state too.
Does this mean that delisting is dependent on Grizzles being introduced in other areas. Introducing them to NM is a bad idea and having pocket populations so they migrate is from place to place is even worse. Can't image having grizzlies migrating back and forth between the Gila and Grand Canyon. California can have them, I suggest San Francisco, Sacramento and LA.
http://www.ksl.com/index.php?sid=30...ing-number-of-grizzlies-in-west&s_cid=queue-1
I know that griz do not proliferate like wolves, but has there been any evidence of these two distinct population segments interacting?
In 2007, a very large griz was hit and killed by a vehicle in Lincoln Montana while crossing Highway 200. There is nothing between Lincoln, and Macdonald Pass to the south but 30 miles of National Forest along the spine of the Nevada Mountains. Keep in mind this was 7 years ago, and griz have been doing pretty well in the meantime.
Despite FWP insistence that there won't be griz in the Highlands and Tobacco Roots. I would bet they travel into and through them frequently. There are solid griz populations in the Gravellys and Greenhorns, and the only thing separating those ranges from the Tobacco Roots is a very lonely Highway 287, in the form of 30 feet of asphalt. And clearly, Griz cross roads.
There have been occasional griz documented in the Pintlers.
So, from Macdonald Pass to the northern reaches of the Tobacco Roots and the Boulder/Jefferson Valleys is 50 miles of National Forest and two highways. From Macdonald Pass to the Pintlers is 35 miles of woods and one highway.
My take is that I wouldn't be surprised to see a grizzly anywhere west of the Little Belts.
I hope we can hunt them sooner than later, and I would love to see them wandering the Elkhorns and the Boulder Mountains. They would just need to get past the ranchers of the Jefferson and Boulder Valleys, and that would not be easy.
The hair traps that volunteers have been setting along the spine of the divide show that connectivity is getting closer everyday. We've seen Grizz in Elk Park, just north of Butte & I'm positive they're in the Belts. For crying out loud - they're up on the Marias and have been found as far east as Loma (Proving once again that everyone loves Montana grain).
While we all see the expansion of bears and know they're out there, the USFWS has a bit more stringent requirement than just hunter reports (It's not really about numbers, it's quantifiable numbers that will withstand litigation - that's why data has to be air-tight).
As habitats fill up, "nature finds away," and those bears search out new places to live. I'm a little surprised we've not had grizzly bears down in the gulches south of Helena due to all the garbage and chickens.
I want them in Colorado!
Crowd control and to scare or feast on the idiot crew that is moving here.
Let's
Rock!