icebreaker12
Active member
With just 600 or so birds in existence, I don't know how any would be considered experimental/non-essential. What is the citation for that quote?
I also can't find anywhere where a crane was shot while legally pursuing other game. Although, I wouldn't call it vandalism. It is poaching to shoot an animal illegally. That case in TX the guy got $25K fine, 5 years probation and community service.
Generally, all illegal hunting acts are referred to as poaching. Vandalism is often given to those acts that are egregious and intentional (as opposed to someone making a mistake). Shooting a whooper with a rifle is what I refer to as vandalism.
Wisconsin now has a population of Whooping Cranes (Grus americana). Technically this species has endangered status, although the birds that are part of the Wisconsin flock have a somewhat different legal status (“experimental, non-essential”).
These birds were reintroduced. And to afford protections to the state, landowners, and hunters they are given the “experimental, non-essential” status. Should someone shoot one and it is determined to be an accident there will be no ESA prosecution. Similarly, that designation has been given to many areas where black-footed ferrets have been reintroduced.
https://wsobirds.org/sandhill-crane-hunt
https://www.fws.gov/midwest/whoopingcrane/pdf/FinalRuleFR.pdf