Mandatory Gun Liability Insurance
- Thread starter 3855WIN
- Start date
rustednuts
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2018
- Messages
- 772
I don't see that surviving legal battles. Is booze insurance and registration fees next?
D
Deleted member 28227
Guest
Who is going to offer the insurance?
Nick87
Well-known member
The things that scumbag people will say, to get votes from stupid people never seizes to amaze.
Last edited:
JohnBud
Well-known member
Just wondering if they also plan to implement fees on other constitutional rights. Mandatory fee for those who want to exercise their freedom of speech? How much will they want to charge for exercising freedom of religion. Asking for a friend.
Irrelevant
Well-known member
Probably the City... then make a killing off of it.
SFC B
Well-known member
To hunt in the UK I had to have insurance. I Joined the Scottish Association for Country Sports, it was 48 GBP for a year membership with comprehensive insurance. I don't have any problem with folks having to have some sort of insurance coverage with relation to their firearms (homeowners, renters, etc). An ownership FEE? That will never survive legal challenge. Only in CA FFS......
Schaaf
Well-known member
There’s big money in insurance. Just ask my healthcare provider.
D_Walt
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2020
- Messages
- 715
Just when you think the commiefornians can’t get any stupider…
Western Traveler1
Well-known member
They never tried it as neither would stand challenges. Too many poor citizens (can we still call the poor poor?) would be unable to afford the right of gun ownership. Think “Saturday night specials”
RobertD
Well-known member
I think you're right. The common argument is "Well, you have to insure your vehicle" but the Bill of Rights doesn't guarantee you the right to a vehicle.
Muley_Stalker
Well-known member
They won't get me. I'm buying a crossbow.
D
Deleted member 28227
Guest
In MA muzzleloaders aren’t considered guns so… always that option.
I think you could probably CC a colt army 1860 without a permit and be 100% legal.
Last edited by a moderator:
Doublecluck
Well-known member
Un vato de las cuatro familias
Beanland_fan
Active member
I see a perfect opportunity for a gun rights organization like the NRA to offer free insurance with a paid membership….
blackbeard
Well-known member
Isn't the ownership fee the price you pay when you purchase? Insurance itself is a scam. Mandatory to have, pay to have it, price goes up if you use it and covers not much of anything.
I'm not a fan, and I don't think SUPCO will uphold this, but it's going to be a long way to get there.
We require insurance for driving a car, but the individual mandate in the ACA was struck down. Laws are all over the place here. None of this does damned thing to change the culture that spawns gun violence though, so this won't do anything but discourage legal gun ownership in favor of the black market. Pretty silly all around.
We require insurance for driving a car, but the individual mandate in the ACA was struck down. Laws are all over the place here. None of this does damned thing to change the culture that spawns gun violence though, so this won't do anything but discourage legal gun ownership in favor of the black market. Pretty silly all around.
noharleyyet
Well-known member
It is about California being the narrative spearhead and useful ideological soldier. Like it or not when California speaks everyone takes notice...and like New York, they are an activist tool of the left.
