Maybe harder isnt necessarily better, just different with unique aspects.
I agree. As stated in my first post on this thread---if you horseback in for two days, hike for one day and spike camp that night, but you are able to harvest your animal at first legal light the next morning---was that a hard hunt or easy hunt. I guess the actual hunt or kill was fairly easy, but getting there ( and back ) was difficult or at the very least time consuming. If I was asked upon return if it was hard or easy, I would most likely respond "enjoyable", "memorable", 'the scenery, hunt, ride, hike, and results were wonderful. and I would have said all that before we had any of harvest for dinner--after dinner--add "delicious"
The above answer is in response to what I believe the OP was asking, however if we were each giving our answer to Addicting or Mr. Cushman, our answer might be different. Actually I am sure it would be different.
Also, how hard the hunt was could be determined by the type of weaponry used. On average, I found a rifle makes the hunt a bit easier than using a muzzleloader, and/or a bow. In fact I gave both ( muzzleloading and bow hunting) up very early on.
However, MTTW was typing at the same time I was, and if I understand his post correctly, he disagrees with me in reference to Bow hunting being harder. Maybe it was only harder for me