I should send in a applicationWe pay a shop laborer(sweeps floor, gets parts, etc.) $26/hr.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I should send in a applicationWe pay a shop laborer(sweeps floor, gets parts, etc.) $26/hr.
I had to do the same and I hated doing them.To clarify - this was for an internal corporate job change. Not for a different company. I was interviewing with my second line. To stay on the "promotable" list, you can't say no to an interview.
I’d mention your life plans that you are bringing to the job along with your experience and expertise.
Any company that doesn’t respect all of them isn’t a place you want to work long term anyway.
That’s assuming this is an upward mobility transition and not a survival situation.
Boomers complain about everything like it is going out of style as well. Holy smokes.I think the greatest generation would agree with me that boomers on average were/are the laziest generation of humans to walk the planet.
Tongue in cheek... the irony of the hippie generation calling their kids lazyBoomers complain about everything like it is going out of style as well. Holy smokes.
To the OP, if you do end up saying that you are busy during that week and they don't move forward with interviewing you, it is probably a job you don't want anyway!
Tongue in cheek... the irony of the hippie generation calling their kids lazy
View attachment 287459
Reminiscing about being high as a kite chasing girls at concerts, and making up for the fact that they sold out to "the man" and got corporate jobs by buying 27 guitars, paying $1500 for original mint condition Blue and Buffalo Springfield records, and paying $5k for front row Stones seats.it's fun to use broad brushes and be a little tongue in cheek. therefore...
from my vantage point all boomers do is sit and refresh outlook all day and write three word e-mails usually confirming attendance to meetings that accomplish nothing while gen z'ers and millennials get all the shit done.
I agree with most of what you've said on this topic, but ^ simply isn't true in many realities. When you don't get work done because you can't find the staff because you have high standards, well then you projects suffer, your clients suffer, and they will, rightfully so, find others that can meet their needs. Plus, what actually happens is that the great staff you already have are pushed even harder because they don't want to see a company they've invested so much in decline, lose clients, miss deadlines, so they work even harder. Until they quit or die (I've seen both). Compromising and hiring quasi questionable employees to simply get some of the work done, even if they're inefficient, allows you to better manage everything, and if you keep your eyes and ears open you can fire someone else later and let the crappy workers go. But I can't tell you how many times I've seen a "questionable" hire thrive in the long term. A lot of people just need better opportunities and better mentorship.Agree with this part but I believe it is largely due to employers believing they have to lower their standards due to high demand/low supply. Keep standards high and fight through the low labor problems that it brings. You will be a stronger company in the long run.
Of course there are no absolutes in life. But as a rule of thumb, I try not to hire seat fillers. But I am certain we have a few. All for mentorship, one of the reasons I am not hung up on degrees. But correcting problems that should have been taken care of during parenting, I have little patience for.I agree with most of what you've said on this topic, but ^ simply isn't true in many realities. When you don't get work done because you can't find the staff because you have high standards, well then you projects suffer, your clients suffer, and they will, rightfully so, find others that can meet their needs. Plus, what actually happens is that the great staff you already have are pushed even harder because they don't want to see a company they've invested so much in decline, lose clients, miss deadlines, so they work even harder. Until they quit or die (I've seen both). Compromising and hiring quasi questionable employees to simply get some of the work done, even if they're inefficient, allows you to better manage everything, and if you keep your eyes and ears open you can fire someone else later and let the crappy workers go. But I can't tell you how many times I've seen a "questionable" hire thrive in the long term. A lot of people just need better opportunities and better mentorship.
To the OP, everyone else hit the nail on the head, before signing an offer but after you have it in hand, with the rare exception of if it's a project specific job and they need a person when you'll be out, then it's better to tell them ahead of time.
I get that view, but I became a much better manager of people once I shifted to the belief that if a worker failed at their job, I was partially to blame. Equal amounts of carrot and stick and all that.Of course there are no absolutes in life. But as a rule of thumb, I try not to hire seat fillers. But I am certain we have a few. All for mentorship, one of the reasons I am not hung up on degrees. But correcting problems that should have been taken care of during parenting, I have little patience for.
If it works for you then run with it. Not only one way to skin this kitty.I get that view, but I became a much better manager of people once I shifted to the belief that if a worker failed at their job, I was partially to blame. Equal amounts of carrot and stick and all that.
View attachment 287518
The contractors whining about engineers and architects is age old... If contractors were so smart they have a a degree and and a license and wouldn't need em. Ask a contractor to put a set of bid documents together that anyone could build/bid. It would be laughable to see what they come up with. Easy to play Monday morning quarterback when you have the plplaybook.
You mean, "whipping shall continue until morale improves" does not derive from quality managers?I get that view, but I became a much better manager of people once I shifted to the belief that if a worker failed at their job, I was partially to blame. Equal amounts of carrot and stick and all that.
View attachment 287518
So I'm still gainfully employed but I've started applying. Two potential employers have given me call backs.
One company I've had 3 Zoom meetings with a Fourth later today , and the other I'll be having my 3rd with next week.
What is the best way to phrase that I have hunts scheduled during what may be the final interview process? and potentially during the first 4 months of the job?
Spoken like a true contractor.Ahhh, good to see they still teach condescension and arrogance 101 to engineers.
They adding pretentiousness to your continuing education reqs, or they still "designing" that course?