This was brought up again in the Idaho Legislation thread, but I thought it deserved attention of its own.
The bill was recently amended. If I understood correctly, the following key changes were made:
1. The number of tags were reduced to 3 each for elk/deer/pronghorn plus 1 each for moose/goat/sheep.
2. The selling organization can retain only 5% of the funds.
Also note that these tags will come out of the non-resident allocation.
http://www.idahosportsmensconnection.com/content/?tag=auction-tags
While these restrictions seem reasonable compared to Utah and the proposed bill in Arizona, I have been convinced we don't need any of these auction tags in Idaho based on principle alone and it's a step in the wrong direction.
What are your thoughts? Now is the time to voice your opinion if you haven't already, since a House vote will likely soon take place.
http://legislature.idaho.gov/house/membership.cfm
The bill was recently amended. If I understood correctly, the following key changes were made:
1. The number of tags were reduced to 3 each for elk/deer/pronghorn plus 1 each for moose/goat/sheep.
2. The selling organization can retain only 5% of the funds.
Also note that these tags will come out of the non-resident allocation.
http://www.idahosportsmensconnection.com/content/?tag=auction-tags
While these restrictions seem reasonable compared to Utah and the proposed bill in Arizona, I have been convinced we don't need any of these auction tags in Idaho based on principle alone and it's a step in the wrong direction.
What are your thoughts? Now is the time to voice your opinion if you haven't already, since a House vote will likely soon take place.
http://legislature.idaho.gov/house/membership.cfm
Last edited: