Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Upsetting, but not surprising. Remember when we were assured merging DOW under the umbrella of P&W was going to be an improvement? All downhill since then. Wildlife and hunting no longer have a place in Colorado.
I see you point, but would simply say that the merging of DOW makes it easier for government antihunters to control the board of P&W and guy hunting under the guise of recreation, etc. Same thing happened to the COGCC board when they flooded the board with antidevelopment advocates.Not sure the merger is as big as a factor in all of this as the 1st gentleman is. Though to your point, things certainly have been on a downward trajectory for a while. Recreation$$$ > Wildlife
I think you are being too harsh, you'll probably still be able to hunt private with outfitters...Seems pretty clear, the new guard of CO politicians are going to push hunters and hunting advocacy groups as far away from CPW as possible. In 10 years hunting won’t even be a thing in Colorado.
You have a point and that is probably why not all of the conservation orgs have left. However, if you are constantly ignored, why put in the effort? All of these non-profit groups have a limited amount of resources (people, time, money, etc) to spend on their missions. Spending resources on a working group that disregards your inputs, at some point, is not worth it. Better to spend those resources elsewhere.While I do agree CPW cares more about recreation than wildlife and that would be very frustrating to be a part of that group, I do question the decision to leave. Like if the partnership didn’t consider wildlife enough before, how is removing wildlife advocates from the partnership going to do anything other than hurt wildlife?
It won't even take 10 years and plenty of people who hunt happily vote for the side that will do it. Oh well, another state down the drain.I think you are being too harsh, you'll probably still be able to hunt private with outfitters...
Their leaving is an ominous sign. They are trying to remove their names from a process they know will result in something very damaging to their cause and if their names remain those who make the changes can say well we consulted with the following stake holders.You have a point and that is probably why not all of the conservation orgs have left. However, if you are constantly ignored, why put in the effort? All of these non-profit groups have a limited amount of resources (people, time, money, etc) to spend on their missions. Spending resources on a working group that disregards your inputs, at some point, is not worth it. Better to spend those resources elsewhere.
From what I've seen, it's the groups he's tied to, under the radar to some. Thank God Polis is termed out.Not sure the merger is as big as a factor in all of this as the 1st gentleman is. Though to your point, things certainly have been on a downward trajectory for a while. Recreation$$$ > Wildlife
Now that Polis (He/Him/His/They/Them/Non-Binary, etc/etc) is in his final term, and with Democrat majority in State House & Senate, he can get really stupid with his agendaFrom what I've seen, it's the groups he's tied to, under the radar to some. Thank God Polis is termed out.