QuazyQuinton
Well-known member
Just finished listening to the podcast this evening. Worth my time spent. Thank you, @Big Fin.
I'm following up looking for a better understanding. You were all really careful in how you talked about the hunter killed in Pennsylvania, which I assume is related to the unresolved legal case. I'm trying to understand if this was a story where the guy was hunting and someone took exception to a black man hunting and killed him for that reason, or was the hunting trip actually a part of a scheme someone used to get the guy into the woods so they could commit a premeditated crime? Either way it's a terrible outcome and a great loss for his family and friends, for sure. It won't bring the guy back, but it makes a difference whether this is a "racism in hunting" incident or simply a scumbag using "hunting" to accomplish his nefarious deed. Am I correct to infer that this is perhaps an open question in the ongoing investigation, and there is not a clear answer at this time?
I thought your guest, Alex, did a good job of making a thoughtful point that for the family and friends of the hunter who was killed, the answer to that question may be secondary to their reflexive response that if black people go hunting and don't come home, then they simply don't want to go hunting or spend time in the outdoors. It doesn't matter to them if it was or wasn't a race-related action; they're not going into the woods where that might happen to them. So I'm kicking that aspect around in my mind....
QQ
I'm following up looking for a better understanding. You were all really careful in how you talked about the hunter killed in Pennsylvania, which I assume is related to the unresolved legal case. I'm trying to understand if this was a story where the guy was hunting and someone took exception to a black man hunting and killed him for that reason, or was the hunting trip actually a part of a scheme someone used to get the guy into the woods so they could commit a premeditated crime? Either way it's a terrible outcome and a great loss for his family and friends, for sure. It won't bring the guy back, but it makes a difference whether this is a "racism in hunting" incident or simply a scumbag using "hunting" to accomplish his nefarious deed. Am I correct to infer that this is perhaps an open question in the ongoing investigation, and there is not a clear answer at this time?
I thought your guest, Alex, did a good job of making a thoughtful point that for the family and friends of the hunter who was killed, the answer to that question may be secondary to their reflexive response that if black people go hunting and don't come home, then they simply don't want to go hunting or spend time in the outdoors. It doesn't matter to them if it was or wasn't a race-related action; they're not going into the woods where that might happen to them. So I'm kicking that aspect around in my mind....