how many points did it take, Mt?

[Dieseldog]

Why do the not let you turn your combo back if you don't draw permit? Or what I mean is why won't they let you have a 100% or even 97% refund? What is their logic? Just $$$? Would maybe save some deer from getting whacked just because a guy has a tag and feels he has to go.

 

[8andcounting]

Why do the not let you turn your combo back if you don't draw permit? Or what I mean is why won't they let you have a 100% or even 97% refund? What is their logic? Just $$$? Would maybe save some deer from getting whacked just because a guy has a tag and feels he has to go.

There would be another guy waiting to buy that tag do deer is gonna get whacked regardless

 

[Muleys32]

There are 17,000 big game combos if that's what you mean Cushman?

Given the split if there were 18,000 applications and 15000 had points and 3000 had 0 points than 100% of people with 0 points would draw and 17% of people with points wouldn't...

Just out of curiosity, Isn't it that 75% of the tags have it so preference points hold weight, whereas 25% of the tags they do not hold weight? Meaning if you have a point and don't get a tag in the 75% of preference point tags, you would still be able to get one of the 25% of tags that are left but your preference points won't help you? Is this correct?

 

[Deleted member 28227]

Just out of curiosity, Isn't it that 75% of the tags have it so preference points hold weight, whereas 25% of the tags they do not hold weight? Meaning if you have a point and don't get a tag in the 75% of preference point tags, you would still be able to get one of the 25% of tags that are left but your preference points won't help you? Is this correct?

No it is my understanding that 87-2-115 creates two pools (5) Points and (6) no points individuals from the subsection (5) group do not become part of the subsection (6) group. I am not a lawyer so this could be a flawed interpretation.

If the code was written in the way in which you outline it could only help you to buy points, I believe that given the way it's written a situation could arise where buying point actually hurts you. That being said I don't think in practice this ever happens.

 

[Muleys32]

No it is my understanding that 87-2-115 creates two pools (5) Points and (6) no points individuals from the subsection (5) group do not become part of the subsection (6) group. I am not a lawyer so this could be a flawed interpretation.

If the code was written in the way in which you outline it could only help you to buy points, I believe that given the way it's written a situation could arise where buying point actually hurts you. That being said I don't think in practice this ever happens.
View attachment 83675

That makes sense. Crazy it would be setup this way.