Forest Service to study ATV impact

Ten Bears

New member
Joined
May 20, 2004
Messages
2,997
Location
North Idaho
ROLLA, Mo. (AP) -- The Mark Twain National Forest has targeted three southeast Missouri sites popular for illegal use by four-wheel drive and all-terrain vehicles for a study aimed at encouraging more responsible land use.

The proposal would open 144 miles of trails for use by enthusiasts of state-licensed off-highway vehicles in forests near Potosi, Fredericktown and Poplar Bluff, Mark Twain National Forest spokeswoman Charlotte Wiggins said Tuesday.

As part of the proposal, 67 miles of roads and trails now being driven on illegal in ecologically sensitive areas would be closed, she said.

The U.S. Forest Service and environmentalists have butted heads many times over the use of off-highway vehicles -- including off-road motorcycles -- in national forests. A plan to expand ATV use in the Mark Twain was dropped a decade ago amid public opposition.

U.S. Forest Service Chief Dale Bosworth has said unmanaged off-highway vehicles use was one of the top four threats to national forests, along with wildfires, dwindling open space and invasive plants and animals. It is one of the reasons the Mark Twain has begun looking for a way to control the all-terrain vehicles.

"We will never have the number of law enforcement people to chase all these people down. That's the real, honest truth here," Wiggins said. "We do know it's a growing sport, and we're trying to manage it."

The proposed trail systems include county, forest and woods roads that have been previously used by motorized vehicles. Small sections of trail would be constructed to connect some of the existing roads.

The proposal calls for 68 miles of existing road and one mile of new road to be open in an old mining area near Palmer, southwest of Potosi. The Cherokee Pass area, south of Fredericktown, would open 44 miles of existing road and one mile of new road.

The third area at Blackwell Ridge near Poplar Bluff would open 28 miles of existing road and two miles of new roads.

"We're not trying to build new trails," Wiggins said. "We're trying to connect the dots between existing trails, and we want to get them out of stream beds and the sensitive natural areas that might have water and endangered plants. Then, we want to study the effects of that."

Jim Scheff, coordinator of Missouri Forest Alliance in St. Louis, said that notion was illogical. His group -- along with others, including Heartwood -- planned to insist the forest service conduct an environmental impact study before vehicles are allowed in the three proposed sites.

"Forest land is put in trust for perpetuity for all people," Scheff said. "People shouldn't be allowed to wreck it for their own entertainment."

The Mark Twain will take comment on the proposal through Feb. 20.

If all goes as planned, the study would start in June, Wiggins said. It was expected to last three years but could be modified or terminated if the impact to the environment is found unacceptable, she said.

A team of biologist, hydrologists, naturalists and others from the forest service will lead the study.

http://www.darnews.com/articles/2003/12/24/news/news6.txt
 
Yeppers, sure looks like the old education route is not workig.... <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>and we want to get them out of stream beds and the sensitive natural areas that might have water and endangered plants. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> And I thought it was just a small percentage of the Fat-Assed ATV riders that caused a problem, and that could be addressed by the Blue Ribber's edjumacation programs.

Looks like the only way to keep ATV'rs from breaking the law is to remove any type of restrictions on riding...
rolleyes.gif
 
Yeppers Ten, only me would be smart enough to figure out that "stream beds and the sensitive natural areas that might have water and endangered plants" might be bad places for ATV's.

The average ATV rider (either the 90% or the 10%) is not smart enough to avoid these areas. Only the Gunner is smart enough to see the problem...
smile.gif
shhh.gif
 
Sounds like they are finally getting it. If you come up with a solution that everyone can accept then it usually works. But I do have to question why they need to do a study? With all those biologists and everyone else it seems like a big waste of limited dollars. If they have any questions all they need to do is ask Gunner!
biggrin.gif
 

Forum statistics

Threads
113,585
Messages
2,026,004
Members
36,238
Latest member
3Wapiti
Back
Top