Caribou Gear

Difference between Nosler Accubond vs Nosler Accubond LR

RugerHawg413

Active member
Joined
Feb 21, 2020
Messages
282
What is better for hunting elk between 150 and 400 yards, accubond 160 grain vs accubond long range 168 grain? Shooting 7mm rem mag, thanks again!
 
The original Accubond has a thicker or stronger jacket. Designed to work well at closer ranges, if you will. Conversely the ABLR is designed to perform better as velocities start dropping off-and get there accurately.
I’ve killed 10 or 12 elk with the 250 gr. Accubond out of a .338 Jarrett (2950 FPS)
Ranges from 30 yards to 500. Classic broadside to hard quartering. The only bullet I recovered was the 500 yard bull, shot through both shoulders.
I’ve killed two deer with the 6.5 creedmore and 129gr ABLR. Both were inside 200 yards. Both shot in the crease. The bullet behaved like a ballistic tip.
I know it’s an apple and oranges comparison.338 vs. 6.5 but particularly on larger critters I’d be inclined to go with the Accubond.
 
For what you are going to do, I would not even consider the ABLR. It is a weaker bullet, than the standard ab, because it is designed to work better at a longer range. There is no free lunch with bullets. Pick it for what you will be doing, and in this case, it is the standard ab. This long range thing has gotten stupid. People do not need "long range" bullets for most hunting scenarios. All you have to do, it to look at the velocity of the bullet at the impact distance, to tell whether you need some kind of specialty bullet. Out to way over 400, you don't. With the bullets designed for long distance, you can have some bad performance at the closer ranges-where many elk are shot anyway. A lot of this long-range bullet thing is just marketing to sell bullets to people that think they have to be able to shoot stuff at 700 yards.
 
I’ve heard that the ABLR can be finicky when it comes to accuracy so if you do go with the ABLR make sure you’re dialed in with them first
 
Back
Top