Clinton and her views on guns.

shoots-straight said:
Like I said before. The constitution guarantees the right to bear arms. It doesn't guarantee our right to public lands. With one law they can start the process to give them away.

For sportsman, I see only Trump or Bernie. Then you look to see who will do more damage if elected.

So by default it goes to Bernie. He hasn't done much with any legislation of his own so he won't be able to hurt us in the Socialistic department.

Clinton is a no for me.
Click to expand...

Well put.
 
tjones said:
If that's all you are hearing you are not paying attention.
Click to expand...


No I'm paying attention, but the fact that Trump supports the enforcement of our immigration laws, which are currently being totally ignored, seems to be the reason some people claim to be "embarrassed" by him.

Would you like to tell me who is a better option?
 
Washington Hunter said:
No I'm paying attention, but the fact that Trump supports the enforcement of our immigration laws, which are currently being totally ignored, seems to be the reason some people claim to be "embarrassed" by him.
Click to expand...

This explains why so many Canadians are hogging my spot on the Mo.
 
Washington Hunter said:
No I'm paying attention, but the fact that Trump supports the enforcement of our immigration laws, which are currently being totally ignored, seems to be the reason some people claim to be "embarrassed" by him.
Click to expand...
Considering the number of deportations, yes, you embarrass yourself by saying that. Luckily, you are anonymous. ;)

You'd have to throw out the 4th amendment to do what Trump wants on immigration. Wish we could sue the makers of the kool-aid that has got his supporters so drunk on these issues. They are way more freaking dangerous to freedom than anything on the table for guns.
 
Last edited:
I have to admit that Obama's masculine 3rd term surrogate Hillary has an uncanny ability to stir real emotion.

Here's mine....
 
RobG said:
You'd have to throw out the 4th amendment to do what Trump wants on immigration..
Click to expand...


Those pesky facts seem to get in the way of the Trumpeters.

They damn sure what to keep the 2nd but are flexible on all the others.
 
RobG said:
Considering the number of deportations, yes, you embarrass yourself by saying that. Luckily, you are anonymous. ;)

You'd have to throw out the 4th amendment to do what Trump wants on immigration. Wish we could sue the makers of the kool-aid that has got his supporters so drunk on these issues. They are way more freaking dangerous to freedom than anything on the table for guns.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure why you say that, about the 4th amendment. I'm all for ending birthright citizenship, are you not? I doubt it would ever happen, and I don't think Trump expects he could make it happen either. Trump wants to be tough on illegal immigration and that's one of the biggest reasons I support him. It's not just the Mexican border that's the problem either. It's Islamic terrorists coming here, and staying, illegally. I'm not sure why any U.S. citizen would want that. But that's what you'll get with any Democratic candidate.

I don't need any Kool aide to support Trump. Not when he represents my views in almost everything, including keeping public lands public. In my opinion, you're anti-American if you don't support Trump. And please don't tell me Bernie Sanders or Hillary Clinton would be better for America.
 
Ben Lamb said:
They come here to recreate because the exchange rate is/was better than staying home.

And I'm being facetious.
Click to expand...

Have you looked at the exchange rate recently? Regina is the same distance as Billings, Great Falls and Minot for me. It is about 30% cheaper to spend the weekend in Regina right now than any of those towns. Lots of Americans up there right now.


Trump just doesn't make any sense and Hillary is a highly flawed candidate, Bernie is not viable.. Cruz is a sniveling weasel and Rubio would make a good spokesman for Just for Men hair coloring.

So where does that leave a person who dislikes all the choices but feel it is their duty and obligation to vote?

Nemont
 
RobG said:
Not defending Hillary, doesn't anyone think the beer analogy is kinda dumb? You note the absurdity of suing the beer industry, but the beer industry doesn't need a law protecting them. Why should the gun industry need one? The law is temporary dependent on administration/congress. It is an incredibly stupid long term plan to set your protections that way, but it does make for one hell of a fundraising opportunity every election.

It may have been better to have a lawsuit against a gun maker go to the SCOTUS so a precedent is set.

Just my two cents.
rg
Click to expand...

RobG said:
Considering the number of deportations, yes, you embarrass yourself by saying that. Luckily, you are anonymous. ;)

You'd have to throw out the 4th amendment to do what Trump wants on immigration. Wish we could sue the makers of the kool-aid that has got his supporters so drunk on these issues. They are way more freaking dangerous to freedom than anything on the table for guns.
Click to expand...


Rob, respectfully, you know nothing about the law. I know you hate Trump, but you're not making much sense.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Patagonia, North Face on the front lines and taking the fight to them
Replies
14
Views
3K
TheNorthStar
TheNorthStar
D
Veterans: Stand up and be counted!
Replies
0
Views
876
dgibson
D
I
An About-Face on America
Replies
10
Views
2K
ELKCHSR
E
C
Words from a former Democrat
2
Replies
28
Views
4K
ELKCHSR
E
B
The case against Bush by Ron Reagan
Replies
12
Views
3K
BuzzH
B

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
113,671
Messages
2,029,115
Members
36,277
Latest member
rt3bulldogs

Share this page

Back
Top