Zach
Well-known member
Jose, you're definitely holding the bottle....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jose, you're definitely holding the bottle....
Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.), ranking member on the Select Committee on Intelligence, appeared on Fox News to criticize the administration while the briefing was still underway.
"In fact, the briefing is still going on, but I don't see how anybody can walk out of there with any kind of comfortable feeling that the administration, from a notification standpoint -- and I emphasize that -- did what they should have done or what they had the opportunity to do," he said.
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who criticized President Obama for breaking the law, skipped the briefing entirely.
Jose, you're definitely holding the bottle....
That second claim is hardening into a news media narrative. CNN has reported in scrolling headlines that six soldiers died looking for Sergeant Bergdahl after senior American military officials say he wandered off his base. The Daily Beast published an essay by a former member of Sergeant Bergdahl’s battalion, Nathan Bradley Bethea, who linked the search to the deaths of eight soldiers whom he named. “He has finally returned,” Mr. Bethea wrote. “Those men will never have the opportunity.”
Jose Cuervo, Josh Korder (a DIRECT source who appeared on CNN) who served with Bergdahl, stated that the deaths of PFC T.J. Foster, 2 LT. D.D. Andrews, and PFC M.M. Martinek occurred on missions while trying to recover Bergdahl. If you want to be technical, Bergdahl couldn't be DIRECTLY responsible for any death unless he pulled the trigger, or otherwise acted with the purpose to cause their deaths. A death by any other means would, by definition, be other than DIRECTLY attributal. You seem to think that if he didn't murder them, he could not be DIRECTLY responsible for their deaths.
Any common sense reading of the word DIRECT in the context which you site would mean that Bergdahl's actions lead to deaths that occurred on missions meant to rescue him, which otherwise would not have happened. For you to conflate the word DIRECT with MURDER shows your willing bias, and inabliltiy to let your political beliefs be confronted with and refined by the plain truth.
This is evidenced futher by your reckless claim that "the GOP doesnt' give a damn about the kid from Idaho..." To nit-pick of the legal/techinical meaning of the word DIRECT (as though it paints with too much of a broad stroak) and then make a claim that impunes the character of a party that represents the values of half of this country is the height of hypocracy and immaturity, and has no place in civil discourse.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/04/the-hero-who-died-looking-for-bowe-bergdahl.html
Joe Crow: Is this the article you are referring to? A link was already post earlier in the thread.
It details two solders who died searching for Bergdahl. Other than the it being from the daily beast I see nothing that suggest that the article is not creditable.