drexal
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 4, 2021
- Messages
- 239
AgreedVery few people make decisions based solely on logic about any issue. We are generally more motivated in our decisions by how it affects us emotionally than pure logic.
I think many of those folks are very aware of the current restrictions on the 2nd Amendment and how we got there. Many are probably equally aware of the compromises along the way that they had little to no say in. But it's never enough... if only we pass this one law and compromise on our rights, things will be ok; only to be told we need additional laws. Meanwhile, the laws already on the books aren't being enforced. Take for example your felon with a firearm (a right lost through due process, btw). Felons are being rearrested for other crimes and found to be in possession of a firearm. And it happens over and over again. But it doesn't get prosecuted. Very rarely. So, if the goal is to be tough on gun crime... be tough on gun crime. But at least do that before having the gall to add more restrictions on law-abiding citizens (many of which own those scary "black" guns).Most folks absolutely certain they won’t accept restrictions of their 2nd Amendment rights aren’t intellectually honest with themselves that they already have accepted restrictions because they agree that restrictions concerning felons owning firearms and certain military weapons and weapons of “mass destruction” should be off limits for everyone to own.
I mean I don't really care for or support a lot of stuff that's going on in the streets of America over the last few years. People have their right to protest and air their grievances. I avoid rallies and protest, but if for whatever reason I needed to be in the area, I wouldn't want to be unarmed. It's not about be a snowflake or not being a snowflake, but about being aware of your surroundings and adjusting accordingly. I've been to some pretty sketchy places both in the US and abroad and those "Tacticool Chads" would be the least of my concerns.Maybe I am just a snowflake or something, but I have to think if I as an avid hunter and unapologetic gun owner am uneasy being around “Tacticool Chad” and the folks carrying around AR’s at public rallies and protests, how do others with much less exposure to guns and gun owners feel about guns after seeing those kinds of displays?
I am convinced the 80% do not come away with a feeling of solidarity and support for gun owners and everyone’s 2nd Amendment rights after seeing that type of “proud gun owner” behavior.
Personally, I am convinced that a lot of gun owners don’t understand or maybe don’t care that we are losing the “culture war” when it comes to the general public’s view of black guns and guns in general.
Sure, because the average joe is not having conversations about the 2nd Amendment. But they are being fed a narrative, which again, either guilts them into supporting anti-gun legislation or gaslights them into silence. By far, the most common firearms tied back to crime and fatalities are handguns. ARs are not even close but guess what conversation we are having. Why? I mean, if we are going to pretend to care about "gun crime", why is the first conversation we are having about so-called "black" guns or "ghost" guns? It's because it's the narrative you are being told to concentrate on.
Overall, it's a complex situation that's being simplified by blaming an inanimate object and those that own them. Which, in turn, lets us ignore the real issues of rampant bad behavior and the lack of personal responsibility and the increasing mental health crisis and the failures of the "war on poverty" and the failures on the "war on drugs". No, instead it's blame the scary guns...