Brenton96
New member
Alright, I think I've pretty much been convinced to go with the warmer bag. Thanks for the input guys!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Once you get your bag--whichever it is--I'd strongly recommend going out in your native hills and doing some winter camping to get a feel for things. I guess if I had to make a recommendation for a new user in your seasons of use I'd go 0*, but I would also be bumming if that was my only bag personally, 'cause I backpack a fair bit May-August too.
If you’re skinny like me go 0 degree. If you have some body fat you’d probably be fine in a 15.
If you’re skinny like me go 0 degree. If you have some body fat you’d probably be fine in a 15.
I might be wrong but ive heard it's more muscle mass. Women sleep colder because they have a higher body fat percentage and a lower muscle mass.
But I'm sure there's a lot of other factors like metabolism personal comforts psychology etc. Maybe a smart doctor person knows better.
I don't think it matters. I think metabolism is more of a factor. Some people just stay warmer than others.
rbljack,
What sleeping pad do you have? I agree that the pad is just as important as the bag. I was planning on getting a therm-a-rest.
Im no expert, but I didn't hear any mention of a sleeping pad. I think that pad selection is going to be just as important as the bag when deciding. Your question related to what bag though, so for me....I have a 15 degree western mountaineer Badger, and hunted in a floorless shelter on top of snow this year with temps that got down into the teens. I was cold, but the second night I put on my puffy pants and wore my base layer top, along with dry socks when jumping in the fart sack, and that kept me fairly comfortable. My pad had an r value of 5 I think. And ironically, it was in wy at approximately 8500 feet in Mid October...LOL, I mention that because you discusses a similar elevation hunt in WY for November.
Face still got chilled, and I should also mention that I sleep cold as well. I think for a one bag set up, the 15 degree bag with a quality High R value pad is the way to go. But because you mention a November hunt, dropping to a 0 degree bag might be worthwhile as well. If you sleep cold... You can always add layers in the bag, or add a liner to the bag to increase the comfort a bit. And as others have said, during a warmer hunt....you can leave the bag unzipped, or use it more like a quilt I suppose. I haven't had that opportunity to use the bag in warmer conditions yet.
The other thing to decide on beforehand is are you going with Down or Synthetic? Mine is down, but with what I have listened to on podcasts, my next bag may very well be a synthetic. Slightly heavier, but much more suited to damp or wet conditions. Randy Newberg was speaking to an expert during a recent podcast discussing the two...and I cant remember which one it was...but the guy made a very good case for a synthetic bag. When I need to upgrade...I will be switching to synthetic.
rbljack,
What sleeping pad do you have? I agree that the pad is just as important as the bag. I was planning on getting a therm-a-rest.
The podcast mentioned above was with Sitka's John Barklow on the Elk Talk podcast.
I used a down bag in Alaska to include 6 days being flown out where it rained most days. It's all a compromise. As long as you have layers and outerwear such that you will survive even if your bag gets wet your good. Keep your bag waterproofed in your pack so if you fall in the water and get some of our layers wet you will still have your bag.
Mine has treated down, waterproof sides, and water resistant top and bottom.
I listened to this podcast, and while I will hands down say he has more experience than I do and more technical expertise in the area I do wish Randy had pushed him on bags just a bit. Sorry John but BS on synthetic bags "not quite as compressible and potentially a little bit heavier". The best bag on the market will at minimum be 1/3 heavier and 2x the size packed as an equivalent down bag, his statement in this area was just flat out inaccurate. Will we someone develop a better synthetic bag that closes the gap with down on these factors, maybe, but to claim we are there now is just not true. If you go 1/3 heavier and 2x space on half the items in your bag, each item not seeming like that big of a deal, you quickly go from a 35lb pack to a 50lb pack.
For the record my next bag will be a 0 degree synthetic bag for really cold wet trips, but let's call a spade a spade.
Fixed it for you.Barklow is a pretty hard core guy.
Fixed it for you.
No doubt he knows his stuff.
https://www.sitkagear.com/experience/a-navy-seal-rewarming-drill
That said, there is a reason why only 10% or so of the high end sleeping bag offerings are synthetic, many companies don't even make them. Synthetic bags are a piece of equipment for a very specific activity, assuming you stuff your bag in a dry sack and put a little thought into keeping it dry (eg I always put my bag back in my dry sack every morning, even if I'm leaving my camp set up) there aren't a lot of circumstances where you could get yourself into trouble with a down bag that wouldn't be equally as crappy with a synthetic bag. My bag is down bag is pretty hydrophobic, I've woken up in the spring to heavy wet snow flattening my tent with my pad wet and the outside of my bag drenched but the down didn't clump and lose it's ability to keep me warm. I was also able to get it dry that day and continue on with my hunt. I am really skeptical that if I jumped into a lake in December with a down bag in one had and a synthetic bag in the other that either would do me a lick of good upon exiting the lake. I want a synthetic bag for long float hunts, in cold but humid areas, where there is a potential for things to be damp for 7-10 days straight, but I have no allusions that I won't still have to be vigilant about keeping my bag dry.