Expecting intellectual depth from this old coal miner is a bridge too far. Happens to be the only point against transfer that I disagree with therefore my post. Arguing camping would end as we know it lacks some intellectual honesty.
Dont put words in my mouth. Show me where I said a transfer would be just fine? I just think the whole "no camping" argument is laughable. Its sad to watch you gaslight yourself by making shit up.
Yes, I am basing my assumptions on the reality of today, not what was decided in the past. Context changes all the time. Believing that the political majority would end camping in Wyoming or any other Western State for that matter, and that the voters would not beat that back almost instantly...
Seriously, you think camping in Wyo would come to and end?
On formerly BLM and FS, yes I do.
On formerly BLM and FS, yes I do.
Less likely that they would change current state land restrictions but same as last two answers. Agree that you have made a point I just don't agree with your...
Yep!
Or mining in CA comes to screeching halt.
I think the no idea line is more correct than not. However, should a transfer happen, I am confident the camping thing would be worked out in short order.
I doubt that statement exists, most likely because they have not thought this through very well.
Which do you honestly think is more likely to happen, camping outside of Private land comes to an end in Wyoming or changes are made to regulation to allow it.
Let me start with the fact that I am not advocating for transfer of Fed land to the States. However, I very much find this point argueing against it to be rather weak. Should a transfer happen, I am 100% confident that I and anyone else for that matter would still be camping and hunting on...