I did too lol 😂 said you just can’t NOT apply in consecutive years not that you had TOO apply in consecutive years. Weird thanks for heads up ha ha. I dont care as I will apply every year but will get clarification just so I can give proper internet advice ha ha.
Incorrect. This is exhausting. It’s says if you DONT apply in consecutive years you forfeit your points. Not sure why this is so confusing. So if I DO apply every other year I have not failed to apply in 2 consecutive years in a row. You only need to apply every OTHER year which means you didn’t...
He is good and can buy a point this year in points only period. He has to apply NEXT year and can buy a 3 rd point and will probably be assured of drawing with 3
If he applied last year he did not have to apply this year and can buy a pp point in the points only period. You can’t skip applying in consecutive years which means you have to enter the draw every other year.
Probably nothing. I might have read it wrong but what I saw said applications that ALSO selected a 2nd and 3rd choice were kicked out of the draw. Sounds like you did it right and were unsuccessful but included. Honestly I’m not really that interested me and my son drew the big game combo and...
They shouldn’t re draw applicants who didn’t apply correctly. They should have been booted out of the system. I jumped to the end of the thread but that’s what it sounds like they are doing?
I was just there and couldn’t even spend my 300 dollar gift card. I did buy a turkey reed call I didn’t need though ha ha. I’m sure they will have bullets or powder people actually use at some point? It’s a joke literally nothing I wanted . Except some Swarovski stuff my gift cards not enough lol
Agreed but I think its dangerous to move away from user pay and I don't understand why we would want to. The proof is in the track record -I want to stress I was not making this about needing to hunt lions or the lack of any management at all. I just think its a stupid use of resources when you...
Thanks for the post Ben I agree with both links-I must not have articulated my view very well. I think sometimes I come off as a "smoke a pack a day" guy. I am not. I have been blessed to live my life in Montana and then Idaho so I have had the opportunity to hunt most everything. I was thinking...
Not sure what you are asking ha ha. Quote from google(lol) of the nam- The North American Model rests on 2 principles- Fish and wildlife are for the non commercial use of citizens and should be managed such that they are available at optimum population levels forever. Ok my view on the nam in...
Yes I will see if I can post the population figure on the lions. I googled it 😂 and yes the estimate was 600 lions in 1920 in California state. I took the high end of the current population of 6000 so that is where I came up with the 10 times. It’s great that you also see the benefit of the nawm...
I agree with you on the 2 different viewpoints. That is a very accurate observation I think. I view it mostly but not entirely from the idea of maximizing consumptive use. Not because I really want to kill a lot more animals in my life but that model most closely aligns with the North American...
I see no citations or science produced in your “ peer” review of my statement ? I understand what a peer reviewed study is supposed to look like. I also understand what it has actually looked like in recent times, I stand by my statement. When your peers share your AGENDA the review by them...
Peer reviewed studies and “ science “ are two words I have grown to hate. Most misused and abused words in the English language last few years. When all your peers share your agenda is it really valuable that they “reviewed” your work?